Skip to main content

Security report for makit.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.makit.lv currently presents minimal accessible content, primarily a Lottie animation on a blank page with no visible metadata, contact information, or business details. The site is built using modern frontend technologies such as React, Gatsby, and TailwindCSS, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure, but lacks substantive content or user engagement features. Security posture is limited due to absence of visible security headers and no SSL configuration data provided, though HTTPS is presumed given the URL scheme. Privacy and compliance policies are not found, which is a concern for GDPR and general data protection compliance. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, reducing overall trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing website content, implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, and improving transparency through accessible contact and business information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching makit.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the minimal content and lack of business information on the website, it is difficult to ascertain market positioning, business model, or target audience. The site appears to be in an early or placeholder state, possibly under development or redirecting users elsewhere. No partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators are present. The use of modern web technologies suggests an intent to build a professional digital presence, but current business intelligence is limited.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low based on available data. No security headers were detected, and no explicit SSL/TLS configuration details were provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site uses plausible.io for analytics, which is privacy-focused, but overall data protection practices are minimal. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the lack of detailed security measures is a concern.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via security headers.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish clear contact information and business details to improve trust and credibility.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Gatsby, TailwindCSS
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
plausible.io
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and appears to be a redirect or placeholder page with a Lottie animation.
  2. No visible metadata such as title or description tags.
  3. No contact information, forms, or business details found in the HTML content.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  6. Uses modern frontend technologies (React, Gatsby, TailwindCSS) but lacks substantive content.
  7. External scripts include plausible.io analytics and unpkg.com for Lottie player.
  8. No social media links or emails found in the HTML content.
  9. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain legitimacy analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Gatsby, a React-based static site generator, combined with TailwindCSS for styling. The use of Lottie animations indicates modern UI/UX design intentions. External scripts include plausible.io for analytics and unpkg.com for loading the Lottie player. Performance is likely moderate given static site generation, but actual content is minimal. Mobile optimization appears good due to responsive CSS classes. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with missing meta tags and minimal textual content. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with makit.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review makit.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.