Skip to main content

Security report for makeinfluence.com

E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Make Influence operates as a performance-driven influencer marketing platform targeting e-commerce brands and influencers. The website presents a professional and modern design built on Webflow, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Dreamdata Analytics. The platform aims to connect brands with influencers to scale marketing efforts effectively. Technically, the site is well-structured with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of tracking scripts, but lacks important security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, impacting the trustworthiness and legitimacy of the domain. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation but requires improvements in transparency, privacy compliance, and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching makeinfluence.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention makeinfluence.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
36
Employees
0
Customers
36
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for makeinfluence.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself in the e-commerce influencer marketing sector, focusing on data-driven performance marketing. Its business model revolves around providing a marketplace and tools for brands and influencers to collaborate and measure campaign success. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a clear target audience of e-commerce brands and influencers. The use of HubSpot and other marketing tools suggests a growth-oriented approach with an emphasis on lead generation and customer engagement. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or contact information limits the ability to fully assess business credibility and market positioning.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and raises privacy concerns, especially in the absence of clear privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data further detracts from the overall security trustworthiness. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident channels.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider adding a security.txt file.
  5. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Performance driven influencer marketing for e-commerce brands ready to scale!
Key services
Influencer marketing, Marketplace for influencers and brands, Performance tracking and analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Dreamdata Analytics, Leadfeeder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for tracking
  • Cookie consent banner script present

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Dreamdata Analytics, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Dreamdata Analytics, Leadfeeder, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Dreamdata, Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the main page.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used extensively.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  6. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Business focus is on influencer marketing for e-commerce brands.
  9. Website built on Webflow CMS with integrations to HubSpot and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and integrations with HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Dreamdata Analytics, and Leadfeeder for marketing and analytics. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs and uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet standards. The absence of security headers and lack of visible server or hosting provider details limit the assessment of backend infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with better security and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with makeinfluence.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review makeinfluence.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.