MakeCommerce is a leading payment solutions provider focused on the Baltic e-commerce market, serving over 6,000 merchants with a comprehensive suite of payment and delivery integration services. The company offers a broad range of payment methods including bank payments, card payments, buy now pay later options, and POS terminals, positioning itself as a key player in the regional e-commerce ecosystem. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, multilingual support, and developer resources facilitating integration with popular e-commerce platforms. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support represents a critical security vulnerability that undermines user trust and data protection. While privacy compliance is well addressed through cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy, the technical security posture requires urgent improvement. Overall, the business appears legitimate and well-established, but the security shortcomings pose a significant risk that should be remediated promptly.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention makecommerce.net, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for makecommerce.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
MakeCommerce operates as a payment service provider targeting e-commerce merchants primarily in Estonia and the Baltic region. Its business model revolves around facilitating payments and delivery integrations, supported by official modules for major e-commerce platforms and a developer portal. The company leverages partnerships with banks and delivery services, enhancing its value proposition. The presence of merchant financing and buy now pay later services indicates diversified revenue streams. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile. Strategic partnerships and a large merchant base suggest strong market positioning and growth potential.
Security posture
The current security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and absence of security headers. Although no known SSL vulnerabilities or outdated protocols are detected, the missing SSL certificate is a critical flaw exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. The cookie consent implementation and privacy policy indicate awareness of GDPR compliance, but the lack of incident response contacts or security policies on the site limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Immediate remediation of SSL and security headers is recommended to elevate security maturity.
Recommendations
Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Optimize website performance to reduce page load times and improve user experience.
The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and various plugins such as Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution. Hosting is provided via Amazon AWS infrastructure. While the site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, performance is slow with a large page size and high resource count. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical debt. The site integrates external services like Calendly for scheduling and Google Analytics for tracking, with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with makecommerce.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review makecommerce.net.