Skip to main content

Security report for maisondor.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website maisondor.lv currently serves a BitNinja anti-robot CAPTCHA challenge page, blocking direct access to its actual content. This indicates the site is protected by a security mechanism to prevent automated or malicious traffic. No business or contact information is directly available on the page, and the content is minimal, focused solely on bot mitigation. The site uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated in metadata, which may pose security risks if the actual site uses these versions. The technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for tracking and security. However, no privacy or cookie policies are present, and no security headers are detected in the HTML content. WHOIS data shows the domain is active with consistent nameservers but lacks detailed registrant information. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for full content analysis due to the security challenge, limiting insights into business operations and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maisondor.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the security challenge page, no direct business information, contact details, or company branding is available. The domain maisondor.lv appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, suggesting a concern for cyber threats. The lack of visible business data, privacy policies, or terms of service limits assessment of market positioning or business model. The presence of outdated CMS metadata may indicate legacy systems or incomplete site updates. No partnerships or related domains are identified from the content. The target audience and industry cannot be reliably determined from the blocked content.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja's security challenge with Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated bot traffic, which is a positive security control. However, the use of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) is a significant security concern, as these versions are known to have vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which reduces defense-in-depth. The SSL/TLS configuration cannot be fully assessed but HTTPS is implied by external script sources. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but with critical areas for improvement, especially CMS modernization and security header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade CMS platforms to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  4. Conduct a full security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities beyond bot mitigation.
  5. Improve transparency by publishing contact information, business details, and security policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website content is a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct access to the actual site content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by recaptcha.net and Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja anti-robot CAPTCHA challenge page.
  2. No business or contact information is directly available on the page.
  3. CMS versions indicated are outdated and may pose security risks.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no visible consent mechanism.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with active domain status.
  8. Content is minimal and purely functional for bot mitigation, no business content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and unsupported. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot prevention. The HTML content is valid but minimal, serving primarily as a security challenge page. Performance is moderate given the limited content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meaningful content and meta descriptions relevant to business. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical debt is high due to legacy CMS and lack of modern security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maisondor.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maisondor.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.