Skip to main content

Security report for maiseliai.lt

Plasta Group · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plasta Group is a leading European company specializing in flexible plastics recycling and manufacturing sustainable polyethylene products. The group operates multiple companies across Europe and is part of the larger CEDO group, a global leader in sustainable FMCG private label solutions. Their business model focuses on recycling post-consumer polyethylene waste and producing eco-conscious products such as garbage bags, films, and resins for various sectors. The company emphasizes sustainability and circular economy principles, holding multiple certifications that reinforce their market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies like Swiper.js and integrates Google Tag Manager and MailerLite for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Hosting is provided by Hostex.lt, and the domain is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. The domain age is relatively new but consistent with a possible rebranding or new web presence. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. Cookie consent is implemented with express consent, supporting basic GDPR compliance. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with good business credibility and moderate technical maturity. Security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and publishing security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with room for improvement in transparency and documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maiseliai.lt

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plasta Group holds a strong market position as a leading flexible plastics recycler and manufacturer in Europe, supported by a broad portfolio of subsidiaries and brands. Their competitive advantage lies in integrated recycling and production processes, enabling high-quality sustainable products with reduced CO2 emissions. The business model includes private-label manufacturing, targeting retail, industrial, and service sectors. The company demonstrates growth through recent acquisitions and financing, and maintains a robust partnership ecosystem including its parent company CEDO. Strategic focus on sustainability and circular economy aligns with market trends and consumer demand, positioning Plasta Group for continued expansion in the European plastics recycling industry.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms, indicating awareness of basic security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests limited readiness for incident management and transparency. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks comprehensive privacy documentation. Enhancing these areas would improve risk management and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by publishing a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plasta Group
Description
PLASTA GROUP is one of the leading flexible plastics recyclers and producers in Europe, developing innovative polyethylene recycling solutions and accelerating a shift to circularity. They produce LDPE garbage bags, plastic film and other products for household and professional sectors. The group consists of several companies across Europe and is part of CEDO, a global leader in sustainable FMCG private label solutions.
Key services
Polyethylene recycling, Production of sustainable plastic products, Private-label product projects, Recycling & extrusion engineering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Swiper.js, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, MailerLite
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with express consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on polyethylene recycling and manufacturing.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  5. Contact email info@plasta.lt is provided in header.
  6. Multiple brands and subsidiaries are clearly presented.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  8. Security best practices partially implemented; DNSSEC missing and security headers not detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Certifications and trust indicators are prominently displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform, utilizing popular libraries such as Swiper.js for interactive elements and Google Fonts for typography. Integration with Google Tag Manager and MailerLite indicates use of advanced marketing and analytics tools. Hosting is managed by Hostex.lt, with domain registration through Tucows Domains Inc. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and loading speed. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to strengthen overall infrastructure security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maiseliai.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maiseliai.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.