Skip to main content

Security report for mailcampaigns.nl

MailCampaigns · E-commerce · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MailCampaigns is a Dutch-based company specializing in effective email marketing solutions tailored for B2B, e-commerce, and omnichannel clients. The company offers strategic advice, campaign development, and a proprietary marketing automation platform, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the digital marketing space. Their website demonstrates a strong market presence with detailed case studies and client logos, reflecting a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and high content quality. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, and service workers, ensuring a good level of digital maturity and user experience. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, supported by visible privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mailcampaigns.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mailcampaigns.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
20%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mailcampaigns.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MailCampaigns targets retailers, e-commerce businesses, and B2B companies, offering tailored email marketing strategies and tools. Their business model revolves around service provision and software platform management, with a focus on measurable results and client commitment. The presence of certifications such as Privacy Waarborg and DDMA membership enhances their credibility. The company showcases multiple successful client cases, indicating strong market positioning and growth potential. Their partnership ecosystem includes recognized privacy and marketing organizations, reinforcing their industry standing. The website content and structure support lead generation and client engagement effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests potential vulnerabilities to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and content injection attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could hinder transparency and responsiveness in case of security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more comprehensive SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MailCampaigns
VAT number
NL864584349B01
Registration number
88336301
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MailCampaigns
Description
Effectieve e-mail marketing, oplossingen op maat. Concrete afspraken en commitment op resultaat. B2B, e-commerce en omnichannel.
Key services
Strategie en advies, Campagne ontwikkeling, Eigen platform, Conversie optimalisatie, Template ontwikkeling, Reputatie management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, Swiper.js, Font Awesome 5 Pro, Service Worker, Continually chat widget, CookieCode cookie management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • Service worker registered
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Continually chat widget, CookieCode cookie management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong presence of trust indicators including certifications and client logos.
  3. Comprehensive contact information including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  6. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection, and Continually for chat support. It employs service workers for offline capabilities and performance improvements. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility basics. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility compliance. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mailcampaigns.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mailcampaigns.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.