Skip to main content

Security report for mahalo-app.io

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at auth.tbsfrance.com is a login portal for a software subsuite named 'mahalo become opper subsuite'. It appears to serve as an authentication gateway for users of this application. The site uses modern web technologies including Angular 14.3.0 and Angular Material for its user interface, with Roboto font loaded from Google Fonts. The content is minimal and focused exclusively on login functionality, with no additional business or contact information provided. The lack of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicates limited compliance with common data protection standards. The WHOIS lookup for the domain failed, showing no registration data, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain. Security headers are not present in the HTML content, and no analytics or advertising scripts are detected, suggesting a minimalistic approach to tracking and marketing. Overall, the site is functional but lacks transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mahalo-app.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind this login portal is not clearly identified on the website. The domain name suggests a connection to 'tbsfrance.com', but no WHOIS data or registrant information is available to confirm this. The service appears to be a subscription or user login based model for a software subsuite called 'mahalo opper'. The target audience is likely existing users or customers of this software. Without visible contact details, privacy policies, or certifications, the business credibility is low. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of public business information and domain registration data limits the ability to assess market positioning or growth potential.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS as indicated by the URL scheme, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options are detected in the HTML content, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The login form collects email and password but does not show visible anti-CSRF tokens or other advanced security measures. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The WHOIS data absence and domain registration uncertainty further reduce trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers, transparent policies, and better domain registration practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add visible contact information and business details to increase transparency and credibility.
  4. Ensure the domain is properly registered and WHOIS information is available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Incorporate anti-CSRF tokens and input validation in login forms to strengthen security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Login portal for 'mahalo become opper subsuite' application
Key services
User authentication, Access to mahalo opper subsuite
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Angular 14.3.0, Material Design (Angular Material), Roboto font, JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL scheme
  • No caching (Cache-Control: no-store, must-revalidate)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for a subsuite application named 'mahalo become opper subsuite'
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact information or business details provided
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible unregistered or private domain
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content
  6. Uses Angular framework and Material Design for UI
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected
  9. Content is minimal and focused solely on login functionality
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 14.3.0 framework with Angular Material components, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It uses Google Fonts (Roboto) for typography and loads scripts as ES modules, which is a current best practice. The site is mobile responsive and uses CSS for styling with no detected CMS or third-party hosting provider information. Performance is moderate based on the presence of multiple font-face declarations and external font loading. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA attributes present but no advanced accessibility enhancements detected. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta description, Open Graph tags, or structured data. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mahalo-app.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mahalo-app.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.