Skip to main content

Security report for magnif.ai

MagnifAI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MagnifAI is an AI-powered software quality assurance solution developed by Globant, positioned as an AI companion to accelerate and automate testing processes. The platform leverages generative AI, agentic AI, and visual AI technologies to improve test generation, workflow automation, and visual testing respectively. It integrates with existing automation frameworks and test management tools, targeting software development and QA teams seeking to enhance efficiency and quality. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and hosted on AWS infrastructure, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, exposing it to security risks. The site demonstrates good SEO and content quality, with clear branding and trust signals such as testimonials and industry recognitions. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols significantly weakens its security posture. Privacy compliance is supported by links to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and a consent management platform is in use. Overall, while the business and technical maturity are strong, urgent improvements in security infrastructure are recommended to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magnif.ai

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MagnifAI operates within the technology sector as a B2B SaaS platform focused on AI-driven quality assurance. It benefits from the backing of Globant, a large multinational technology company, enhancing its market credibility and reach. The product targets enterprises and software teams aiming to reduce QA cycle times and improve testing accuracy through AI automation. Its presence on major cloud marketplaces like Google Cloud and Azure indicates a strategic partnership ecosystem and broad distribution channels. The company emphasizes innovation, integration ease, and tailored solutions for diverse industries including media, education, retail, and finance. Growth indicators include recent product launches, industry awards, and a global user base. The business model relies on subscription or licensing fees for AI-powered testing tools and services. Strategic partnerships and continuous innovation position MagnifAI competitively in the AI quality assurance market.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability exposing all data transmissions to interception. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and important security headers beyond X-Frame-Options are missing. While no known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the lack of encryption and HSTS implementation significantly increases risk. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of a consent management platform and links to privacy policies suggest some compliance with data protection regulations, but the technical security gaps undermine overall trust. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration and enhancement of security headers are essential to improve the security maturity and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload flags.
  4. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Establish and publish a clear security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels.
  6. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
  7. Improve accessibility features and performance metrics tracking for better user experience and SEO.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature content management approach. Hosting is provided via AWS infrastructure, as inferred from DNS nameservers. The site uses jQuery and several Elementor and plugin scripts for frontend functionality. Despite the modern stack, performance data is missing or zero, suggesting a lack of performance monitoring or suboptimal loading times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and alternate language versions available. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive metadata, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of HTTPS and weak SSL/TLS configuration represent significant technical risks. The site uses Usercentrics for cookie consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics, reflecting compliance and marketing integration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magnif.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magnif.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.