Skip to main content

Security report for magmametal.lv

SIA MAGMA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA MAGMA is a Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing and installation of metal constructions, established in 1992. The company offers a range of metal products including hangars, stairs, railings, barriers, and elevator shafts, serving clients both within Latvia and internationally. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and basic SEO features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided, which may impact user trust and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magmametal.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on metal constructions. It has a long-standing market presence since 1992, indicating experience and potential competitive advantage in quality and delivery. The business model centers on custom manufacturing and installation services targeting construction and industrial clients. The website content is professional and relevant but lacks comprehensive trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may limit customer engagement and compliance with data protection regulations.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts was found, indicating limited security maturity. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts that could introduce privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA MAGMA
Description
SIA Magma is a company founded in August 1992 specializing in manufacturing and installation of metal constructions. They produce various metal products including hangars, stairs, stair railings, barriers, elevator shafts, and other metal items according to client requirements. Their work is present throughout Latvia and beyond.
Key services
Metal constructions manufacturing, Metal constructions installation, Custom metal products (hangars, stairs, railings, barriers, elevator shafts)
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Essential Grid, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or visible content.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and plugin scripts.
  7. No social media links or email addresses found in the visible content.
  8. Content is in Latvian language with some English meta tags.
  9. Business appears to be a small metal construction manufacturer with local and international clients.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins like WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a standard technology stack for small to medium business sites. The use of Google Fonts and jQuery is typical but may impact performance if not optimized. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by reducing dependencies on older libraries and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magmametal.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magmametal.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.