Skip to main content

Security report for magiclick.net

MagiClick Digital · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MagiClick Digital is a well-established technology and design agency specializing in digital transformation, omni-channel banking, and e-commerce platforms. The company serves visionary businesses and large financial institutions, boasting a portfolio of high-profile clients such as HSBC, IKEA, and Domino's Pizza Eurasia. Their business model focuses on B2B technology and digital services, positioning them as a leading player in the technology sector since 1996. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms and leverages modern technologies including Microsoft Azure for hosting and telemetry, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. The CMS appears to be Sitefinity, supported by partner badges displayed on the site. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses anti-forgery tokens in forms, indicating attention to secure data handling. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues, which slightly reduces the overall trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, MagiClick Digital presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. To enhance security posture and compliance, the company should implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publish security incident contacts, and improve security header configurations. Further verification of domain registration details is recommended to address WHOIS data gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magiclick.net

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MagiClick Digital operates in a competitive technology services market, focusing on digital transformation for banking and retail sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering complex omni-channel platforms and maintaining relationships with major global clients. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through consulting, platform development, and ongoing support. Target customers include banks, retailers, and enterprises seeking digital innovation. Growth indicators include a diverse client portfolio and multiple industry certifications. Partnerships with Microsoft, Deloitte, and CMS providers strengthen their ecosystem. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding omni-channel solutions and enhancing digital experiences for financial institutions.

Security posture

The security maturity of MagiClick Digital is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and anti-forgery tokens protect form submissions. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact technical security. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MagiClick Digital
Description
MagiClick Digital is an award-winning interactive technology, design, and marketing services company helping visionary businesses create great digital services. They specialize in digital transformation, omni-channel banking and e-commerce platforms, and delivering modern digital platforms for banks and enterprises.
Key services
Technology consulting, Digital transformation, Omni-channel banking platform, Omni-channel e-commerce platform, Design and marketing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Azure Application Insights, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
ASP.NET Web Forms
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of anti-forgery tokens in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Azure Application Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Azure Application Insights
Marketing tools
Azure Application Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage HTML.
  4. Strong branding and professional presentation with high-profile clients.
  5. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools without visible privacy compliance mechanisms.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using ASP.NET Web Forms and hosted likely on Microsoft Azure, leveraging Azure Application Insights for telemetry and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The front-end uses JavaScript libraries including Owl Carousel for UI components. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The CMS is likely Sitefinity, supported by partner badges. No broken elements or errors were detected. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie management, which could affect compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magiclick.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magiclick.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.