Skip to main content

Security report for magadenovac.hr

Općina Magadenovac · Government · Croatia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Općina Magadenovac is a Croatian municipal government entity providing local administration and public services to residents of Magadenovac. The website serves as an official communication channel offering news, public notices, open data, and transparency documents. It targets local citizens and stakeholders, supporting community engagement and information dissemination. The business model is governmental, focusing on public service rather than commercial activities. The domain is well-established since 2008, reflecting a stable local government presence. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, hosted by CARNET, a reputable Croatian academic network. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and includes modern web technologies. Google Analytics is integrated with a cookie consent mechanism, indicating moderate user tracking with privacy considerations. The site demonstrates good SEO and usability practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options are not evident and could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, suggesting an area for enhancement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements. It effectively serves its purpose as a municipal information portal with good technical and security standards. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and maintaining up-to-date software to ensure ongoing protection and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magadenovac.hr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a local government authority in Croatia, focusing on public administration and community services. It holds a stable market position as an official municipal portal, providing transparency, open data, and public procurement information. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government budgets. The target audience includes local residents, businesses, and governmental stakeholders. The site shows indicators of growth and modernization through EU-funded projects and digital initiatives. Partnerships appear limited to governmental and regional entities. The content and structure reflect a focus on transparency and public engagement, supporting trust and accountability.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. Incident response contacts and security policies are not published, limiting transparency in security governance. The site uses standard CMS and libraries, which require regular updates to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to the latest secure versions.
  4. Enhance visibility of incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Općina Magadenovac
VAT number
OIB: 47221079851
Registration number
MB: 2680505
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Općina Magadenovac
Description
Općina Magadenovac is a local government municipality in Croatia providing public services, local administration, and community information.
Key services
Public administration, Community announcements, Open data and transparency, Local development projects, Public procurement information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Mootools, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Slideout.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Croatian municipal government site with official information and public announcements.
  2. Uses Joomla CMS with standard government website design and structure.
  3. Includes cookie consent with detailed categories and user controls.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking with consent mechanism in place.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  8. No adult or questionable content present.
  9. WHOIS data confirms legitimacy and consistency with government entity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery/Mootools for scripting. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. Hosting is provided by CARNET, a reputable Croatian academic network, ensuring stable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with standard carousel and menu scripts. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to modernize JavaScript usage and improve security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magadenovac.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magadenovac.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.