Skip to main content

Security report for madamemarissa.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Madame Marissa is an adult content website requiring users to confirm their age before accessing sexually explicit material. The site targets consenting adults and offers adult entertainment content with an emphasis on BDSM and femdom themes. The business model appears to be content access gated by age verification, but no detailed business or contact information is provided on the site. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend styling and functionality, and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has a basic cookie consent mechanism. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in the provided data. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie banner but lacks GDPR explicit statements or data retention policies. Overall, the site has moderate technical quality but low business credibility and security posture, resulting in a moderate risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching madamemarissa.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention madamemarissa.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
76
Employees
0
Customers
76
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
21%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for madamemarissa.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector, focusing on niche BDSM and femdom content. It targets adult users who voluntarily access explicit material. The lack of publicly available business registration, contact details, or certifications limits trust and transparency. The site likely generates revenue through subscription or content access fees, but no direct monetization details are visible. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains and minimal external links suggest a standalone operation. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of user behavior tracking, but no advanced marketing or affiliate programs are evident. The business appears small and focused on content delivery rather than broader ecosystem partnerships.

Security posture

Security posture is weak due to missing WHOIS registration data, absence of security headers, and no visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation. The site implements an age verification gate and cookie consent banner, which are positive but insufficient for robust security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The use of common JavaScript libraries without version details leaves potential for vulnerabilities. Overall, the site lacks comprehensive security controls and transparency, increasing risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user data.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear contact information and business credentials to improve trustworthiness.
  4. Provide terms of service and a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance compliance and security transparency.
  5. Conduct a WHOIS registration check and ensure domain registration data is accurate and publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Madame Marissa is a website containing sexually-oriented adult content including visual images and verbal descriptions of nude adults and sexual acts. It requires age confirmation before entry and targets consenting adults only.
Key services
Adult content access, Age verification gate
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Age verification gate
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website contains adult content with mandatory age verification.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent banner present but basic.
  4. No contact information or business credentials found on site.
  5. Uses common web technologies like Bootstrap and jQuery.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  8. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No social media or contact emails present.
  10. Site design and navigation are good and mobile optimized.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard frontend stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and basic interactivity. Google Analytics is integrated for tracking user behavior. The site includes a cookie consent banner indicating some privacy awareness. However, no CMS or backend technologies are identified. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization details. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA or advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The lack of security headers and unknown SSL status are technical risks. The site could benefit from modernization and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with madamemarissa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review madamemarissa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.