Skip to main content

Security report for maatc.lt

Marijampolės apskrities atliekų tvarkymo centras · Government · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website maatc.lt represents the Marijampolės apskrities atliekų tvarkymo centras, a regional government entity responsible for waste management services in Marijampolė county, Lithuania. The site provides comprehensive information about waste collection, sorting, regulatory documents, and public services, targeting local residents and businesses. The business model is public sector focused, delivering essential environmental services with a clear regional mandate. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several common plugins, including cookie consent management and responsive design frameworks. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes accessibility features such as an accessibility toolbar. Performance is moderate, with modern libraries and no evident technical debt. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration analysis, but the website's content and domain usage suggest legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents a solid digital presence for a regional government service, with good privacy compliance and a professional user experience. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency could further enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching maatc.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Marijampolės apskrities atliekų tvarkymo centras operates as a government-affiliated regional waste management center serving Marijampolė county. Its competitive advantage lies in its official mandate and comprehensive service offerings including waste collection, sorting, and public information dissemination. The business model is service-oriented, funded likely through public budgets, targeting local municipalities, residents, and businesses. The website reflects a stable partnership ecosystem with local government and environmental agencies. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of project pages suggests ongoing development initiatives. The company maintains a clear focus on regulatory compliance and public transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented for GDPR compliance. No visible security misconfigurations or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security incidents. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR, but formal security policies and certifications are not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public informational site but could benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance monitoring and auditing practices to maintain compliance with evolving data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Marijampolės apskrities atliekų tvarkymo centras
Description
A regional waste management center serving Marijampolė county, Lithuania, providing waste collection, sorting, and processing services, along with public information and regulatory documents.
Key services
Waste collection and disposal, Waste sorting and recycling guidance, Public information and regulatory compliance, Project implementation related to waste management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Bootstrap, Responsive Lightbox, Cookie Law Info plugin, TranslatePress
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable plugins and libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional government waste management center site for Marijampolė county, Lithuania
  2. Content is in Lithuanian language with good localization
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limits, but no red flags in website content
  5. No visible security challenges or WAF blocking
  6. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with Elementor and common plugins
  7. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content
  8. Contact information is provided via contact page and forms
  9. No social media links detected in the main navigation or footer
  10. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder, leveraging jQuery, Owl Carousel, Bootstrap, and other common frontend libraries. The site uses a cookie consent plugin compliant with GDPR and includes accessibility tools. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO-friendly meta tags. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. The site would benefit from improved security header implementation and potential performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with maatc.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review maatc.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.