Skip to main content

Security report for lztv.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lztv.lv is currently a parked domain with minimal content primarily focused on advertising and domain resale. There is no active business presence or service offering visible on the site. The domain appears to be offered for sale, with no identifiable company or organizational information. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Adsense domain parking scripts and AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. There is no evidence of HTTPS or advanced security headers, and no forms or user input fields are present. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a basic privacy policy page available and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site lacks business credibility and trust indicators, and the domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain age or registrant details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lztv.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the domain parking status, there is no active business model or market positioning to analyze. The domain is likely held for resale or future development. No contact information, certifications, or business registrations are present. The site targets general internet users who may be interested in purchasing the domain. Advertising revenue through Google Adsense and related networks appears to be the primary monetization method. There are no partnerships or subsidiaries linked to this domain. The lack of content and business data indicates a low maturity level and limited operational footprint.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no indication of HTTPS usage or SSL certificate presence, which is a critical security deficiency. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface, but the heavy use of third-party advertising scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks. No incident response or security policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data further limits trust assessment. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add essential security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  4. Provide clear business contact information and legitimacy indicators to improve trust.
  5. Reduce reliance on third-party advertising scripts or vet them for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This domain appears to be a parked domain potentially for sale.
Key services
domain sales
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Adsense Domains CAF, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense Domains CAF, AdsDeli tracking
Marketing tools
Google Adsense, AdsDeli
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain landing page with minimal content
  2. No business or contact information provided
  3. No HTTPS detected in provided data (cannot confirm SSL)
  4. Heavy use of advertising scripts and domain parking ads
  5. No forms or user input fields present
  6. No social media or external business links
  7. Privacy policy page exists but is minimal
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit
  10. No security headers or advanced security features detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging Google Adsense Domains CAF scripts for monetization and AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. There is no detected CMS or advanced web framework. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks accessibility and SEO best practices. Performance is average due to external ad scripts. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical risk. The site is simple and lightweight but lacks modern web development features and security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lztv.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lztv.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.