Skip to main content

Security report for luxriot.com

A&H Software House, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luxriot is a technology company specializing in video management software solutions, offering a range of products including standalone and enterprise editions, as well as advanced modules such as license plate recognition, face recognition, and video content analysis. The company targets security professionals, system integrators, and enterprises requiring robust surveillance solutions. Their business model revolves around software licensing, supported by hardware options and client applications for multiple platforms including iOS, Android, and MacOS. The website presents a professional and comprehensive digital presence with detailed product information and customer testimonials, indicating a well-established market position since 2004. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Slick Slider, and Ninja Forms for interactive features and data collection. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, supporting moderate user tracking and advertising efforts. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit security policies or incident response information. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a notable gap in privacy compliance. Additionally, the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and reduces overall trustworthiness. Overall, Luxriot's website reflects a mature business with strong content quality and technical implementation but would benefit from improved security practices and clearer domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, adding cookie consent mechanisms, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luxriot.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luxriot operates in the video surveillance technology sector, offering a comprehensive suite of video management software products and modules that cater to a wide range of security needs from small installations to enterprise ecosystems. Their competitive advantage lies in the versatility of their software, supporting nearly any IP camera and integrating advanced analytics such as face and license plate recognition. The company leverages partnerships with regional security integrators and solution providers, as evidenced by references to partner companies across multiple countries. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, hardware sales, and support services. The target customer segments include security firms, enterprises, and public infrastructure operators. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, a broad feature set, and active social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem is robust, enhancing market reach and customer support capabilities.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the Luxriot website is moderate. The site employs HTTPS, which is fundamental for secure communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness communication. Privacy compliance is partial, with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security best practices and transparency are recommended to strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web-based attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure registration legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A&H Software House, Inc.
Description
Powerful and smart, accepts nearly any camera, has a wide range of features and a long list of add-ons, enabling efficient video management, surveillance.
Key services
Video management software, License Plate Recognition, Face Recognition, Video Content Analysis, Mobile clients for iOS and Android, MacOS Thin Client, Hardware options
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Slider, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Ninja Forms WordPress plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, MacOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-1060925926)
Marketing tools
Ninja Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive
  5. Contact information is primarily via forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. Good branding and professional presentation
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  9. No visible security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the WordPress CMS platform, utilizing popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive UI components. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user behavior tracking and marketing analytics. The use of Ninja Forms plugin indicates structured data collection via forms, primarily for newsletter subscriptions and inquiries. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of images and scripts to optimize user experience. Mobile optimization is good, supporting multiple device types including iOS, Android, and MacOS clients. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced to meet higher standards. The technical infrastructure appears stable but would benefit from improved security configurations and performance tuning for faster load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luxriot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luxriot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.