Skip to main content

Security report for luxpetclub.com

Lux Pet Club · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lux Pet Club is a small local club based in Riga, Latvia, focused on dog and cat breeding, training, exhibitions, and related services. The website serves as an informational and service platform for pet enthusiasts, providing details about club activities, services, and contact information. The business targets pet owners and breeders in the local region, positioning itself as a community and service provider for pet care and education. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates common plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and TranslatePress for multilingual support. The site is hosted likely via GoDaddy, with proper HTTPS enabled and Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional for its niche but should improve privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luxpetclub.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lux Pet Club operates in the niche pet club and service sector, focusing on dog and cat breeding and training. Its business model revolves around community engagement, education, and service provision including documentation and exhibitions. The company is small-sized, founded recently in 2022, and targets local customers in Latvia. The website supports business growth by providing structured information and social media integration. There is no evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, service charges, and event participation. The club's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus and local presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for expanding digital presence and compliance to attract a broader audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not disclose any incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, limiting transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Establish and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins, themes, and platform components to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lux Pet Club
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lux Pet Club
Description
Lux Pet Club Ķinoloģiskais Klubs, Gērtrūdes 109, Rīga. Suņi un Kaķi. Apmācība. Dokumenti pārošanai un iegādei. Izstādes. Sugas kucēnu iegāde.
Key services
Training, Documentation for breeding and purchase, Exhibitions, Pet-related services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Analytics, TranslatePress, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, CoBlocks
Frameworks
Astra Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain statuses (clientDeleteProhibited etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based pet club site with WooCommerce components.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information includes physical address and social media links but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  4. Good SEO and structured data usage with Yoast SEO and JSON-LD.
  5. No visible security headers detected; SSL is enabled and properly configured.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  8. No forms with sensitive data fields detected on the homepage content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and WooCommerce plugin for e-commerce functionality. It leverages popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and TranslatePress for multilingual support. The site uses jQuery and Google Analytics for frontend interactivity and analytics tracking. Hosting appears to be through GoDaddy, inferred from registrar and DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to improve resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luxpetclub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luxpetclub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.