Skip to main content

Security report for lux-ident.com

LUX-IDent s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LUX-IDent s.r.o. is a leading RFID transponder manufacturer based in Central Europe, specializing in RFID inlays and transponders across multiple frequency bands. The company operates under the parent company HID Global and serves various industries including animal ID, access control, and logistics. Their website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, targeting business customers requiring RFID solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and uses HTTPS with Google Analytics for tracking. Security posture is generally good with enforced HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit security policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting trust and legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website presents a credible business front but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lux-ident.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in Central Europe as a specialized RFID manufacturer, leveraging partnerships such as with Mifare. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and OEM design services for RFID products, targeting sectors like industry, logistics, and animal identification. The website indicates medium company size with a subsidiary in Germany. The detailed product and service offerings, along with certifications and partner logos, suggest a mature business with established industry relationships. Growth potential is supported by diverse product lines and technical capabilities. However, the lack of visible WHOIS data and limited direct contact details online may hinder trust from new customers or partners.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security plugins like Wordfence, indicating awareness of security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism observed, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. The WHOIS data absence is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, explicit security policies, and improved privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LUX-IDent s.r.o.
Description
LUX-IDent is the leading RFID transponder manufacturer in Central Eastern Europe. Their product portfolio includes transponders, disc tags, inlays, prelams, key fobs, wrist bands, laundry tags.
Key services
RFID transponder manufacturing, Printing personalization, Laser engraving, OEM design, Chip coding, Ultrasonic welding, Digital cutting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Visual Composer, LayerSlider, RevSlider, Google Analytics, jQuery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security plugins (Wordfence script detected)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on RFID manufacturing
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, which is unusual for an active business website
  3. HTTPS is enforced with no visible security warnings
  4. No cookie consent banner detected, potential GDPR compliance gap
  5. Contact information is available via contact pages but no explicit emails or phone numbers found in main HTML
  6. Use of common WordPress plugins and Google Analytics for tracking
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Visual Composer and LayerSlider plugins, with jQuery and Google Analytics integrated. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration and loads external resources from trusted domains. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider elements. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the visible code. Hosting provider details are not explicit from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lux-ident.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lux-ident.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.