Skip to main content

Security report for luvu.lv

LUVU, LTD · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LUVU, LTD is a small creative agency based in Latvia specializing in packaging design, web design, brand identity, and photography services. The company targets businesses seeking professional branding and packaging solutions, positioning itself as an expert in package design and visual identity. The website content is well-structured and professionally presented, showcasing recent projects and client testimonials, which supports its credibility in the creative services market. Technically, the website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.7.2 and Google Maps API, with custom JavaScript for interactive elements. While the site is functional and moderately optimized for mobile, it lacks modern security headers and does not provide explicit SSL/TLS configuration details. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates limited compliance with data protection regulations. From a security perspective, the site does not exhibit blocking or WAF mechanisms, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of HTTPS confirmation, outdated libraries, and missing security policies represent areas of concern. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good business credibility but requires improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luvu.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LUVU, LTD operates in the creative design sector, focusing on packaging, branding, and web services. Its market positioning is niche, targeting clients who value high-quality visual identity and packaging solutions. The business model is service-oriented, relying on project-based engagements showcased through portfolio examples. The company appears to maintain a small operational size with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The absence of social media and analytics tools suggests a conservative digital marketing approach. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of recent projects indicates ongoing activity. The company’s partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security events. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file further limits transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture requires significant enhancement to meet industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LUVU, LTD
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LUVU, LTD
Description
LUVU, LTD offers services in packaging design, packaging development, web design, web development, graphic design, branding, logo design, visual identity, photography, and food styling.
Key services
Packaging design, Photography, Web design and development, Brand identity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Google Maps API, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes company email and physical address in Latvia.
  5. No phone numbers or social media links explicitly found.
  6. Website uses older jQuery version (1.7.2) which may have security implications.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  9. Website design is professional with clear navigation and good content quality.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage or contact section; no data collection observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on older JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.7.2, which may introduce security risks and compatibility issues. It uses Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience. The site appears custom-built without a recognizable CMS, which may limit scalability and ease of updates. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal, with meta keywords and description present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The lack of analytics tools suggests limited user behavior tracking and data-driven optimization. Technical debt is present due to outdated libraries and missing modern security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luvu.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luvu.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.