Skip to main content

Security report for luunja.ee

Luunja Vald · Government · Estonia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luunja Vald is a local government entity in Estonia providing a comprehensive range of municipal services including social aid, education, cultural activities, urban planning, and waste management. The website serves as an official portal for residents and stakeholders to access news, contact information, and administrative resources. The site is built on the Liferay CMS platform and uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure supports both desktop and mobile users with a moderate performance profile and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but the use of outdated JavaScript libraries and lack of security headers indicate areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luunja.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Luunja Vald as a small-sized government organization focused on serving its local community in Estonia. Its business model is public service-oriented, with key services spanning social support, education, cultural engagement, and municipal administration. The site reflects a consistent branding strategy and maintains trust through official contact details and regular content updates. The presence of partner domains related to cultural and administrative services indicates a collaborative ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies may affect stakeholder confidence. Growth indicators include active news updates and community engagement features. The website's digital presence supports transparency and accessibility for its target audience.

Security posture

The current security posture shows a foundational level of maturity with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.2) introduces potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited. The absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, limiting transparency and preparedness. The integration of Google Analytics without a cookie consent mechanism raises privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, significant improvements are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and deploy a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Luunja Vald
Registration number
75003476
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luunja Vald
Description
Official website of Luunja municipality providing information about local government, services, news, events, and community resources.
Key services
Public administration, Social services, Education information, Cultural and sports activities, Urban planning and construction permits, Waste management, Tourism information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Bootstrap, Font Awesome 4.5.0, Google Fonts (Roboto Slab, Open Sans), Google Analytics (ga.js), Liferay Portal
Frameworks
Liferay
Platforms
Web (desktop and mobile)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal government portal for Luunja Vald in Estonia.
  2. Content is comprehensive for local government services and community information.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries poses potential security risks.
  5. No visible security headers in HTML content, suggesting room for security improvements.
  6. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented in footer and contact pages.
  8. Mobile navigation and responsive design are implemented adequately.
  9. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics via the legacy ga.js script. The HTML structure is valid with meta tags for viewport and compatibility. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good with a dedicated mobile navigation menu. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen reader labels present. SEO optimization is basic, with canonical links and meta titles but no structured data or Open Graph tags beyond a single og:image meta tag. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luunja.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luunja.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.