Skip to main content

Security report for luqi.fr

Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website luqi.fr appears to be a business-oriented site with a focus on technology, likely related to PDF document handling or similar services, as indicated by the use of PDF.js libraries. The domain is mature, registered since 2014, and uses Cloudflare DNS, suggesting a professional hosting environment. However, the website content is minimal with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and lacks contact information, which limits trust and compliance assessment. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking tools, but security headers and explicit compliance mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity but lacks critical privacy and business transparency elements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luqi.fr

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
95
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LuQi.fr is positioned as a small technology business based in France, founded in 2014. The site uses modern web technologies and integrates marketing and monitoring tools like Instana and ChurnZero, indicating an interest in user engagement and performance monitoring. However, the lack of visible business descriptions, contact details, and compliance documentation suggests a limited public-facing business presence or an early-stage digital footprint. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the available data.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and domain registration protections such as serverUpdateProhibited and serverTransferProhibited statuses, which enhance domain security. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking but no evident vulnerabilities were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Improve website content quality and navigation clarity to enhance user experience and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
PDF.js, AngularJS (implied by ng-cloak usage), Google Fonts (Signika), Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
AngularJS, Material Design (Angular Material)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes serverUpdateProhibited, serverTransferProhibited, serverDeleteProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Instana
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Instana, ChurnZero
Marketing tools
ChurnZero
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and PDF.js for document viewing.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  5. Website content is minimal and mostly technical with no clear business description.
  6. External scripts include tracking and marketing tools (Instana, ChurnZero).
  7. Domain is active and well-maintained with Cloudflare DNS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AngularJS and Angular Material frameworks along with PDF.js for PDF rendering, indicating a modern but somewhat dated JavaScript stack. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, which provides DNS-level security and performance benefits. The site loads asynchronously several external scripts for monitoring and marketing purposes. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with limited meta tags and no structured data detected. There is room for modernization and technical improvements, especially in accessibility and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luqi.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luqi.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.