Skip to main content

Security report for lupapiste.fi

Cloudpermit Oy · Government · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lupapiste, operated by Cloudpermit Oy, is a Finnish government-related online platform providing comprehensive services for construction permits and related permit acquisition processes. The platform targets Finnish residents and businesses involved in construction, offering a streamlined digital service including permit applications and an e-commerce store for permit documents. The website integrates official Finnish identity verification via Suomi.fi, enhancing trust and security for users. Technically, the website employs standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with a third-party LeadDesk chat widget for customer support. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. However, some technical improvements are needed, such as fixing the anti-CSRF token implementation and adding security headers to strengthen the security posture. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses strong authentication mechanisms but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities were detected, but the placeholder anti-CSRF token suggests a potential security misconfiguration. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with targeted measures. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website appearing legitimate, trustworthy, and professionally maintained. Strategic recommendations include fixing security token implementation, enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, and publishing explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lupapiste.fi

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lupapiste operates as a key digital service platform in the Finnish construction permit sector, leveraging its partnership with Cloudpermit Oy and integration with Suomi.fi for identity verification. Its business model centers on providing an end-to-end online service for permit applications and related services, including a dedicated e-commerce platform for permit documents. The company targets Finnish construction professionals and residents, positioning itself as a leading service in this niche. The use of official Finnish authentication services and a professional web presence supports its competitive advantage. Growth potential lies in expanding digital services and enhancing user experience. The partnership ecosystem includes Cloudpermit Oy and Finnish government services, reinforcing legitimacy and operational stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of strong identity verification via Suomi.fi. However, the presence of a placeholder anti-CSRF token indicates a security implementation gap that could expose the site to CSRF attacks. The absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears professional but would benefit from formalizing security policies and improving technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Fix the anti-CSRF token implementation to ensure valid tokens are generated and verified.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible to users.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloudpermit Oy
Description
Lupapiste provides all permits and services related to obtaining permits for construction through a world-class service platform.
Key services
Permit applications, Permit acquisition services, Permit document e-commerce
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, LeadDesk Webchat widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-CSRF token present in login form
  • Use of Suomi.fi authentication for strong identity verification

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
LeadDesk Webchat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Finnish government-related service platform for construction permits.
  2. Content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  3. Use of Suomi.fi authentication indicates integration with official Finnish identity services.
  4. Anti-CSRF token implementation appears incomplete or placeholder.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found on login page but privacy policy likely exists on /info/fi.
  6. No phone numbers or emails explicitly listed on login page.
  7. External links mostly to related service subdomains and official Finnish services.
  8. Use of LeadDesk chat widget for customer support.
  9. No social media links found on login page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, supplemented by a LeadDesk chat widget for customer engagement. The site is mobile-optimized and has a professional design with clear navigation. However, the anti-CSRF token is not properly implemented, which is a technical debt and security risk. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the HTML. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of chat scripts. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance features to enhance overall technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lupapiste.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lupapiste.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.