Skip to main content

Security report for lukaspavelec.cz

Lukáš Pavelec · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lukáš Pavelec is a seasoned web designer and UX specialist based in the Czech Republic, with over 14 years of experience and a portfolio exceeding 250 projects. The website showcases a professional service offering focused on creating strategically designed, user-centered websites that align business goals with user needs. The business operates as a small entity, providing UI/UX design, WordPress development, content strategy, and tender preparation services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Salient theme, enhanced with Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security respectively. The hosting is provided by cesky-hosting.eu, consistent with the domain's Czech origin. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is well-designed, content-rich, and trustworthy, but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of lukaspavelec.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lukaspavelec.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets clients needing professional web design and UX services, primarily small to medium enterprises and organizations in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in extensive experience, a comprehensive portfolio, and a clear process that includes workshops and strategic planning. Revenue streams are service-based, focusing on design, development, and consulting. The company maintains a direct client relationship model without evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators include a large client base with repeat customers and detailed service offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with SEO optimization and structured data, supporting market visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect the contact form from spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears informal, typical for a small business or individual professional.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish an incident response contact or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements and formal cookie consent mechanisms to enhance user trust and legal compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lukáš Pavelec
Registration number
IČ: 75564823
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lukáš Pavelec
Description
Webdesigner and UX specialist with over 14 years of experience, having completed over 250 web projects ranging from simple corporate websites to complex web applications. Focuses on creating websites that connect business goals with user needs, emphasizing strategic, functional, and effective design.
Key services
UI/UX design, WordPress website development, Content strategy, Preparation of specifications for tenders
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Select2, Fancybox, Event Post plugin
Frameworks
Salient WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional portfolio and service site for a Czech web designer and UX specialist.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  4. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  5. Good use of SEO plugins and structured data for enhanced search presence.
  6. No social media links found in the content.
  7. Clear business contact information including phone, email, physical address, and company registration details.
  8. No evidence of advertising or affiliate marketing beyond Google Analytics tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Salient theme and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for better search engine understanding. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam. Hosting is provided by cesky-hosting.eu, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain's origin. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. Some technical debt is noted in the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features. Overall, the technical stack is solid for a small professional service site but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lukaspavelec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lukaspavelec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.