Skip to main content

Security report for luhmuehlen.de

Turniergesellschaft Luhmühlen mbH (TGL) and Ausbildungszentrum Luhmühlen - Lüneburger Heide GmbH (AZL) · Other · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a small, specialized business focused on equestrian sports, training, and event hosting in Germany. It serves as a portal for Turniergesellschaft Luhmühlen mbH (TGL), Ausbildungszentrum Luhmühlen (AZL), and related equestrian organizations. The content is basic but relevant to its niche audience, emphasizing horse riding sports and associated events. Technically, the site uses legacy technologies such as Flash alongside modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and plugins for galleries and sliders. Hosting appears to be managed via luenecom.de DNS servers. The site lacks modern CMS indicators and shows only basic SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is minimal, and the design is functional but basic. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement details and security headers, and it uses deprecated Flash technology, which poses security and compatibility risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor privacy compliance. Analytics are implemented via Piwik hosted on a related domain, suggesting moderate user tracking. Overall, the website is functional for its purpose but requires significant improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and modernization of technology to enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luhmuehlen.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the equestrian sports sector, providing event hosting, training, and club activities. Its market position is regional/national with a focus on specialized equestrian audiences. The business model revolves around organizing tournaments, educational courses, and supporting horse breeding and riding clubs. Revenue likely derives from event fees, training programs, and membership dues. The partnership ecosystem includes subdomains representing key business units. Growth indicators are not visible from the site content. The company maintains a moderate branding consistency but lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the use of deprecated Flash technology, absence of HTTPS enforcement details, and lack of security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not disclosed. The use of Piwik analytics suggests some level of user tracking but without visible privacy controls. The site would benefit from implementing modern security best practices, including HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Remove deprecated Flash content and replace with modern, secure alternatives.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information and security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Turniergesellschaft Luhmühlen mbH (TGL) and Ausbildungszentrum Luhmühlen - Lüneburger Heide GmbH (AZL)
Description
The website represents entities involved in equestrian sports, training, and eventing including Turniergesellschaft Luhmühlen mbH (TGL), Ausbildungszentrum Luhmühlen (AZL), and Pferdezucht- und Reitverein Luhmühlen e.V. (PZRV). It focuses on horse riding sports, training courses, and tournaments.
Key services
Equestrian event hosting, Training and educational courses, Horse breeding and riding club activities
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Colorbox, Flowplayer, Coin Slider, Flash (deprecated)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  4. Use of deprecated Flash technology is a security and compatibility concern.
  5. Website uses Piwik analytics hosted on a related domain statistik.luenecom.de.
  6. External links mostly point to subdomains related to the main domain or trusted external sites like Microsoft and Facebook SDK.
  7. No social media links explicitly found except Facebook SDK script inclusion.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) or meta tags beyond basic keywords and description.
  9. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  10. Basic design and navigation with moderate branding consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery and various JavaScript plugins for UI elements. Flash is still present, which is deprecated and insecure. The hosting provider is linked to luenecom.de, which also hosts analytics services. The site lacks modern CMS indicators and shows basic SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved by removing legacy technologies and optimizing assets. Mobile optimization is basic, and the site uses inline JavaScript and CSS with some conditional IE styles. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luhmuehlen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luhmuehlen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.