Skip to main content

Security report for luenecom.de

Lünecom · Telecommunications · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lünecom is a regional internet service provider based in northern Germany specializing in fiber optic internet, IP telephony, and IPTV services. The company positions itself as a local provider delivering high-speed internet connectivity to consumers and businesses in its region. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging about its core offerings and target market. The digital infrastructure leverages HubSpot CMS and marketing tools, Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and integrates analytics platforms such as Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior insights. The technical implementation is modern and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie management. However, the site lacks explicit terms of service and security policy pages, which could enhance legal and security transparency. WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC privacy restrictions but shows no inconsistencies with the business claims. Overall, Lünecom's website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR, serving its regional telecommunications market effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luenecom.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention luenecom.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for luenecom.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lünecom operates as a medium-sized telecommunications company focused on fiber internet services in northern Germany. Its business model centers on providing high-speed internet, IP telephony, and IPTV to local customers. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers such as HubSpot and Cookiebot to optimize customer engagement and compliance. The website's content and structure indicate a clear market positioning as a regional ISP with a focus on quality and customer experience. The absence of detailed contact information on the website suggests a possible reliance on inbound digital leads or offline channels. The use of affiliate programs like Aklamio indicates engagement in referral marketing. The company appears to maintain a professional digital presence with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its competitive advantage in the local market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The use of Cookiebot allows granular user consent management, enhancing privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap that could be addressed to harden security further. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional security best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user agreements.
  4. Consider adding clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lünecom
Description
Dein lokaler Internet Anbieter für Glasfaser aus dem Norden. Lünecom bringt dir blitzschnelles Glasfaser, IP-Telefonie & IPTV.
Key services
Glasfaser (fiber optic internet), IP-Telefonie (IP telephony), IPTV
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (likely for DNS and CDN), Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, Hotjar, PostHog (ph_#_posthog cookie)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Cookiebot.
  3. Privacy policy is present and detailed in German.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  5. Use of HubSpot for analytics and messaging indicates professional marketing setup.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. WHOIS data limited due to DENIC privacy but consistent with business claims.
  8. Website content is professional, focused on fiber internet services in northern Germany.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, HubSpot analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie management. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains and uses slick-carousel for UI components. The performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses IPv6-enabled nameservers and custom DNS infrastructure. There is no indication of hosting provider from the HTML, but the use of HubSpot and Cloudflare-related domains suggests a professional hosting and CDN setup. The technical implementation is solid with opportunities to improve accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luenecom.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luenecom.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.