Skip to main content

Security report for lueneburg.de

Landkreis Lüneburg / Hansestadt Lüneburg / Wirtschaftsfördergesellschaft mbH für Stadt und Landkreis Lüneburg · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lueneburg.de serves as an official information portal for the Lüneburg region in Germany, providing details about the district administration, city services, tourism, and economic development. It targets residents, tourists, and local businesses, positioning itself as a regional government and municipal service provider. The site links to official partner domains representing the district, city, and economic development agency, reinforcing its legitimacy and regional focus. Technically, the site employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with jQuery, and Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious visitor tracking. The cookie consent mechanism is well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with no visible critical vulnerabilities but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy. No contact emails or phone numbers are directly visible in the provided content, which may limit direct user engagement. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lueneburg.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lueneburg.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
29
Employees
0
Customers
28
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
38%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lueneburg.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a public sector entity focused on regional governance and economic development. Its business model revolves around providing information and services to citizens, tourists, and businesses in the Lüneburg area. The presence of official logos and partner links indicates a strong local government ecosystem. The site does not appear to monetize through advertising or affiliate programs but uses Matomo analytics to understand visitor behavior. The lack of direct contact information or forms suggests a primarily informational role rather than transactional. The partnership ecosystem includes district and city official sites and an economic development agency, indicating collaboration within regional public services. Growth indicators or founding year are not disclosed, but the domain and content align with a stable regional government presence.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external script URLs with https) and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, no explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are visible in the HTML content, and no security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a privacy-conscious approach to tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. The absence of contact emails or phone numbers reduces attack surface but also limits incident reporting channels. Overall, the site is secure for its informational purpose but could improve by publishing security policies and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags to increase search engine visibility and content discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Landkreis Lüneburg / Hansestadt Lüneburg / Wirtschaftsfördergesellschaft mbH für Stadt und Landkreis Lüneburg
Description
Information portal about the Lüneburg region, its district administration, city services, and economic development support.
Key services
Information about district administration, City services for citizens, Tourism promotion, Business development support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, Matomo Analytics, Cookie Consent Manager (ccm19.de)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookie Consent Manager (ccm19.de)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional government and city information portal for Lüneburg, Germany.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented with official logos and partner links.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear user options and GDPR compliance.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; no direct data collection visible.
  6. Uses Matomo analytics for visitor tracking, respecting privacy standards.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No social media links found in the provided HTML.
  10. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content; actual HTTP headers unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern web stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including jQuery 3.5.1. It integrates Matomo analytics for visitor tracking and a cookie consent manager from ccm19.de, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site loads external scripts and stylesheets from trusted CDNs and partner domains. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization techniques detected. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport meta tags and responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles used in modals but no comprehensive accessibility features identified. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. The site structure is clear and navigation is straightforward, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lueneburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lueneburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.