Skip to main content

Security report for luckyvegas.com

LuckyVegas · Other · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LuckyVegas is an online casino platform offering a variety of casino games and promotions targeted primarily at European adult audiences. The website presents a professional design with clear branding and multi-language support, indicating a focus on accessibility and user experience. The business model revolves around online gambling with bonuses and free spins to attract and retain players. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with performance optimizations such as WP Rocket, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers in place, though the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages is a notable gap. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust somewhat, but the site content and structured data suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the site is functional and well-constructed but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching luckyvegas.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention luckyvegas.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,098
Employees
0
Customers
2,098
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for luckyvegas.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LuckyVegas positions itself as a competitive online casino in the European market, offering popular slot games and promotions. The presence of affiliate links to related gambling sites suggests a partnership ecosystem to drive traffic and revenue. The business targets adult gamblers with localized content for countries like Finland, UK, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. Revenue streams likely include player deposits, game commissions, and affiliate marketing. The company appears to have been founded around 2021, with no parent or subsidiary companies explicitly identified. Growth indicators include a modern website with frequent game updates and promotional offers. Strategic observations include the need for improved transparency in privacy and security policies to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks from common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published incident response contacts, vulnerability disclosure policies, or security certifications limits the site's security maturity. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no visible privacy policy or GDPR-specific disclosures. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and formalizing incident response procedures to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an online gambling platform but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations fully.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all users.
  5. Add visible trust seals, certifications, or licenses to reinforce legitimacy and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LuckyVegas
Description
An online casino created by casino players. Step inside Lucky Vegas Online Casino and discover a whole new world of Casino games. Make your wins count!
Key services
Online casino games, Promotions and bonuses, Registration and login for players
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WordPress, WebP Express, SkillOnNet web components
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of service worker for PWA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed online casino platform.
  2. Multi-language support for European countries.
  3. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which may indicate privacy protection or new registration.
  6. Contact email support@luckyvegas.com found in configuration.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Content is gambling-related and targeted at adults only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, WP Rocket for caching and performance, and integration with Google Tag Manager and Analytics for marketing insights. The site uses web components from SkillOnNet and supports progressive web app features via a service worker. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading and preconnect hints are implemented, contributing to fast load times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive content. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on third-party scripts and affiliate links requires ongoing monitoring for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with luckyvegas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review luckyvegas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.