Skip to main content

Security report for lucida.to

Other · Saint Kitts and Nevis

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website doubledouble.top serves as a simple region selection landing page directing users to USA or Europe subdomains. It lacks substantive business information, contact details, or policy documents, indicating a minimal online presence likely for a small or new business. The domain is privacy protected and registered in Saint Kitts and Nevis, which is common for privacy but reduces transparency. Technically, the site uses modern web standards with a clean, mobile-optimized design and is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing basic performance and security benefits. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy or cookie policies indicates room for improvement in security and compliance. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing activity. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content but lacks trust signals and business credibility.

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lucida.to

This scan found 9 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
60
Network security
100
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind doubledouble.top appears to operate a region-based web service or platform, as evidenced by the region selection interface. The lack of detailed business information, contact data, or policies limits insights into market positioning or revenue streams. The domain's privacy protection and offshore registration suggest a preference for anonymity or privacy. The site likely targets a general audience requiring regional access, but the business model and sector remain unclear. The presence of USA and Europe subdomains indicates a focus on these markets. No partnerships or certifications are evident, and the minimal content suggests an early-stage or low-profile operation.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer/update protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduces the overall security maturity. No forms or user input fields are present, minimizing attack surface, but also limiting user engagement. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response and security policy information are missing, which could hinder timely handling of security events. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information and incident response details to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website provides a region selection landing page redirecting users to USA or Europe subdomains.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Inter)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses HTTPS
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal landing page for region selection with no additional content or policies.
  2. No contact information or business details provided on the site.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  6. Domain uses Cloudflare DNS and hosting but no DNSSEC enabled.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Website design is modern and mobile optimized but content is minimal.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, using Google Fonts for typography. It is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS and CDN services but DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS features like backdrop-filter and gradients. No CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site. Performance is likely fast due to minimal content and Cloudflare hosting. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The technical setup is simple but effective for a landing page, with opportunities for modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lucida.to. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lucida.to.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.