Skip to main content

Security report for lucesem.at

lucesem® - Ihr Komplettanbieter für EDV! · Technology · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

lucesem® is a well-established IT service provider based in Klagenfurt, Austria, offering a broad range of IT solutions including managed IT services, cloud services, VoIP telephony, repair services, and data recovery for both business and private customers. The company has a strong regional presence and serves local and international clients. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with popular plugins and themes, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO best practices. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate is a critical security shortfall, exposing users to potential risks and undermining trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the business demonstrates credibility and professionalism but must urgently address its SSL/TLS configuration to improve security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lucesem.at

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT services for businesses and private customers in Austria, particularly in the Kärnten region. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive IT support, cloud solutions, telephony, and repair services. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a history dating back to 2007, suggesting stability and experience. The presence of multiple service categories and detailed service pages indicates a diversified offering. The company maintains social media profiles on Facebook, Twitter (X), and YouTube, enhancing its marketing reach. The website content and structured data suggest a focus on customer service and local market leadership. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

Security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate, which is a fundamental requirement for secure web communication. The site does not implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), OCSP stapling, or session resumption, which are important for SSL performance and security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing exposure to common web attacks. The site uses no known vulnerable libraries but lacks explicit security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and privacy policies. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site requires immediate SSL remediation and enhancement of security headers to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several popular plugins including Slider Revolution and Yoast SEO. It uses jQuery and Leaflet for interactive maps. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics, along with Facebook Pixel for marketing tracking. The site has a large page size and high resource count, resulting in slow load times (~28 seconds), indicating potential performance optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with meta tags and structured data. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but IP address suggests a possible CDN or hosting service. The site uses a cookie consent plugin (Complianz) compliant with GDPR. Overall, the technical stack is modern but performance and SSL configuration need improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lucesem.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lucesem.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.