Skip to main content

Security report for lu.ma

Luma · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luma is a technology SaaS platform specializing in event hosting, invitation management, and ticket sales. Founded in 2017, it targets event organizers and attendees seeking an easy-to-use platform to create memorable events. The website presents a professional and modern interface with clear branding and consistent messaging. The business model revolves around providing online tools for event creation and ticketing, positioning Luma as a niche player in the event technology market. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel with Cloudflare DNS and security services, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and domain transfer protections, although DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy and terms policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms and incident response contacts are lacking. Overall, the website is trustworthy, secure, and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in transparency and user privacy controls.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of lu.ma. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lu.ma

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lu.ma, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
223
Employees
0
Customers
223
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lu.ma.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Luma operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for event management. Its competitive advantage lies in offering an integrated platform for event pages, invites, and ticketing. Revenue likely derives from subscription or transaction fees. The target market includes small to medium event organizers globally, with a digital-first approach. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides support via email. The domain age and registration details align with a legitimate, established business. No direct parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The platform's ecosystem includes help documentation and mobile app availability, indicating a mature product offering.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and domain transfer lock status. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a formal vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. Privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may impact compliance in some jurisdictions. The use of Cloudflare Insights indicates monitoring of traffic and potential threats. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding DNSSEC, cookie consent, and explicit incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including dedicated security contact emails.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing more detailed business contact information and possibly physical address.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luma
Description
From beautiful event pages to effortless invites and ticketing, Luma is all you need to host a memorable event.
Key services
event page creation, invites management, ticket sales
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to event hosting
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  5. Privacy and terms policies are present and comprehensive
  6. No explicit contact phone numbers or physical addresses found
  7. Social media presence on X and Instagram
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  9. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel with Cloudflare DNS and security services. It uses Google Fonts and includes optimized media assets such as videos for light and dark themes. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with prefetching and deferred script loading. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based solution. The technical infrastructure is robust and modern, supporting a high-quality user experience with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 −1Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 72/100 −1Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lu.ma. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lu.ma.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.