Skip to main content

Security report for ltkt.lt

Lietuvos kultūros taryba · Government · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lietuvos kultūros taryba is the official Lithuanian Culture Council responsible for providing funding, guidelines, and support to cultural organizations, creators, and regional cultural development initiatives within Lithuania. The organization operates as a governmental or non-profit entity, serving a broad audience including NGOs, private and public cultural institutions, and individual creators. Their website offers comprehensive information on funding competitions, project financing, stipends, and cultural research, positioning them as a key national cultural funding body. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Select2, Fancybox, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for analytics and marketing purposes. Accessibility is a strong focus, with the implementation of the Readabler tool providing multiple accessibility modes and features. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some security headers are missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has a robust cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving its governmental cultural funding role effectively. Strategic improvements include adding security headers, publishing terms of service and security policies, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ltkt.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lietuvos kultūros taryba holds a strong market position as Lithuania's official cultural funding authority. Its business model revolves around governmental and non-profit funding distribution, targeting cultural organizations and creators. The organization leverages partnerships with design and IT firms for website development and accessibility enhancements. Revenue streams are primarily public funding allocations. The website's comprehensive content and structured navigation indicate a mature digital presence. Growth indicators include active funding competitions and cultural research projects. The partnership ecosystem includes design agency Godspeed and IT company InfoFace, supporting digital infrastructure and branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR standards, reflecting awareness of privacy and data protection regulations. Accessibility features are robust, enhancing inclusivity. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content, indicating good operational security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish clear terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security collaboration.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lietuvos kultūros taryba
Registration number
302951857
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lietuvos kultūros taryba
Description
Lithuanian Culture Council providing funding, guidelines, and support for cultural organizations, creators, and regional cultural development.
Key services
Funding competitions, Guidelines and regulations, Project financing, Stipends, Cultural research and statistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Select2, Fancybox, Readabler accessibility tool, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Accessibility compliance with Readabler

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on cultural funding and support in Lithuania.
  3. Good privacy and cookie consent implementation.
  4. Accessibility features are robust and comprehensive.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-supported technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Select2 for enhanced select elements, Fancybox for media display, and Readabler for accessibility compliance. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes comprehensive accessibility features, such as multiple accessibility modes and an online dictionary. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which should be addressed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ltkt.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ltkt.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.