Skip to main content

Security report for lsz-lira.hr

Javna ustanova Razvojna agencija Ličko-senjske županije - LIRA · Government · Croatia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Javna ustanova Razvojna agencija Ličko-senjske županije - LIRA is a Croatian regional government agency established in 2008, focused on promoting and coordinating regional development activities in Ličko-senjska županija. The agency facilitates investment climate improvement, entrepreneurship, and socio-economic growth through project management, funding administration, and strategic planning. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, targeting regional stakeholders, investors, and public entities. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, includes accessibility features, and is mobile optimized, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and provides comprehensive contact and policy information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lsz-lira.hr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates as a public regional development entity, leveraging EU and national funding to support projects in infrastructure, education, and social programs. Its market position is stable within the Croatian government sector, with a clear focus on Ličko-senjska županija. The business model centers on facilitating and managing development projects and tenders, serving local government, businesses, and citizens. The presence of multiple project and tender listings, along with partnership links, indicates active engagement in regional development. The agency maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media integration, supporting transparency and stakeholder communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and secure form handling including CSRF tokens. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is standard but should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and scripts for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanism to include explicit user consent and tracking control.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Javna ustanova Razvojna agencija Ličko-senjske županije - LIRA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Javna ustanova Razvojna agencija Ličko-senjske županije - LIRA
Description
Razvojna agencija Ličko-senjske županije – LIRA, osnovana je 2008.g. sa zadaćom poticanja, provedbe i koordinacije aktivnosti regionalnog razvoja, stvaranja pozitivne klime za ulaganje i poduzetništvo s ciljem ostvarenja gospodarskog i društvenog razvitka Ličko-senjske županije
Key services
regional development coordination, project management and implementation, funding and grant administration, strategic planning, information dissemination, employment and training programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, jQuery 3.6.0 slim, AccessibilityForAll library, Google Tag Manager, custom CSS and JS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with CSRF token in newsletter subscription
  • Accessibility and privacy features implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional
  2. Content is primarily in Croatian language
  3. Strong focus on regional development projects and tenders
  4. Good accessibility features implemented
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. No explicit terms of service page found
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and detailed
  8. Newsletter subscription form includes consent checkbox and CSRF token
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 5.1.3 and jQuery 3.6.0 slim, indicating a modern and responsive front-end framework. Accessibility features are implemented via AccessibilityForAll library, providing multiple user interface options for diverse users. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads external fonts and stylesheets efficiently with preload and prefetch hints. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. The CMS is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or less common platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and accessible user experience but could benefit from enhanced performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lsz-lira.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lsz-lira.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.