Skip to main content

Security report for lsdf.lv

Latvijas Sporta Deju Federācija · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Sporta Deju Federācija is a Latvian sports federation dedicated to sports dance. The website serves as an official portal providing event calendars, competition results, rankings, membership information, and educational resources for dancers, coaches, judges, and clubs. The federation targets the Latvian sports dance community and operates as a non-profit organization. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting both Latvian and English languages. Technically, the website uses JavaScript and jQuery with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, though accessibility features are basic. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Security headers and advanced security policies are not visible, and HTTPS status is unknown from the data provided. From a security perspective, the site implements a cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness. However, no terms of service, security policies, or incident response contacts are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site appears trustworthy and safe, with room for improvement in security posture and compliance documentation. The overall risk is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing terms of service and security policies, verifying SSL configuration, and improving accessibility and privacy compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lsdf.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Latvian Sports Dance Federation occupies a niche national market serving sports dancers and related professionals in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in being the official governing body for sports dance, providing authoritative event information, rankings, and educational resources. The business model is non-profit and membership-driven, focusing on community engagement and sport promotion. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event registrations, and sponsorships. The target customer segments are dancers, coaches, judges, clubs, and sports enthusiasts. Growth indicators include active event calendars and updated results. The federation maintains a partnership ecosystem with clubs and educational centers but no external business partnerships were identified from the website. Operationally, the federation maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and relevant content.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic to moderate. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates GDPR awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers, terms of service, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests gaps in security governance and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, which is positive. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented. Compliance with GDPR is partially demonstrated but could be improved with clearer policies and data retention disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but would benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive terms of service and security policy page to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration across the entire site.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to strengthen security culture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Sporta Deju Federācija
Description
Latvijas Sporta Deju Federācija is the Latvian Sports Dance Federation, providing information about sports dance events, results, rankings, clubs, dancers, coaches, judges, education center, and federation documents.
Key services
Event calendar, Competition results, Rankings, Membership information, Educational resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and functional.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Contact emails are present but no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  6. Website uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to sports dance federation.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional JavaScript and jQuery stack with asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and charset. The site supports multiple languages (Latvian and English) and includes a cookie consent banner. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site uses custom JavaScript for UI interactions such as calendar month picking and video fullscreen playback. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta description content. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lsdf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lsdf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.