Skip to main content

Security report for lsbolagen.se

Lindström & Sonden AB · E-commerce · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindström & Sonden AB operates the website lsbolagen.com as an e-commerce and distribution agency specializing in kitchen appliances such as wine coolers, range cookers, and outdoor kitchens. The company has been active since 2004 and serves customers across Europe through multiple e-commerce sites. The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and the Make theme, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. The technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and no detected security headers. The site lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Notably, the domain WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the active website presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lsbolagen.se

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche e-commerce and distribution agent in the kitchen appliance sector, targeting European consumers interested in premium brands. Its business model combines agency representation with direct online sales. The website content is basic but informative, focusing on product categories and brand representation. The absence of contact details and privacy policies limits transparency. The company appears small in size but established since 2004. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a critical anomaly that requires further investigation to confirm business legitimacy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes Google Analytics with opt-out capabilities, indicating some attention to security and privacy. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, minimizing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy and cookie policies represent compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindström & Sonden AB
Description
Lindström & Sonden AB (LSBolagen.com) is an e-Commerce company and distribution agent operating since 2004. They have several agencies and run multiple e-commerce websites across Europe, selling wine coolers, range cookers, and outdoor kitchens from well-known brands.
Key services
E-commerce sales, Distribution agency services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), jQuery, Cycle2 jQuery plugin, WordPress
Frameworks
Elementor, Make WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Make theme.
  5. Google Analytics tracking is implemented with opt-out functionality.
  6. Content is primarily informational about the company and its e-commerce activities.
  7. WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which is unusual and suspicious.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive CSS adjustments.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage for data collection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder and the Make theme, supported by jQuery and Cycle2 for slideshow functionality. Google Analytics is integrated via MonsterInsights plugin with asynchronous loading and opt-out mechanisms. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and embeds a map from Snazzy Maps. Performance is moderate with some inline CSS and JavaScript optimizations. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive CSS rules. No advanced security headers or modern frameworks beyond WordPress ecosystem are detected. The domain's hosting provider is not identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lsbolagen.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lsbolagen.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.