Skip to main content

Is lrk.no a Scam? Security Check Results - Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb

lrk.no Security Report Summary

lrk.no received a security score of 39 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Potentially Unsafe". This report covers Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb's website security posture. Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb operates in the Other industry in Norway.

Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb is a Norwegian local sports club specializing in swimming and water polo. Founded in 2013, it offers swimming courses for children and adults, organizes competitive events, and fosters athletic development from basic skills to international competition levels. The club maintains an active online presence with social media integration and a functional website that supports member engagement and course registration. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and Facebook SDK for social features. While the site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistent registration details aligned with the club's Norwegian identity.

The security scan identified 37 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook SDK, Nivo Slider, Custom JavaScript.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

L

Is lrk.no Safe? Security Analysis for Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb

https://www.lrk.no/

Check if lrk.no is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherNorwaysmall
jQueryGoogle reCAPTCHAFacebook SDKNivo SliderCustom JavaScript
Analyzed Completed
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for lrk.no

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb is a Norwegian local sports club specializing in swimming and water polo. Founded in 2013, it offers swimming courses for children and adults, organizes competitive events, and fosters athletic development from basic skills to international competition levels. The club maintains an active online presence with social media integration and a functional website that supports member engagement and course registration. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and Facebook SDK for social features. While the site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistent registration details aligned with the club's Norwegian identity.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle reCAPTCHAFacebook SDKNivo SliderCustom JavaScript

16 urgent findings need attention

1 critical · 15 high

  • + 8 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep lrk.no under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for lrk.no.

Security Headers

7 findings

20/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

35/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

4 findings

70/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The club operates primarily as a non-profit sports organization targeting local community members interested in swimming and water polo. Its revenue streams likely include membership fees, course fees, sponsorships, and donations. The website reflects a stable and consistent brand with clear navigation and relevant content for its audience. Partnerships such as with tryggivann.no for course registration enhance its service offerings. The club's market position is regional with a focus on both grassroots and elite athlete development. The presence of sponsors and active social media channels indicates community engagement and growth potential.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting contact forms. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security or incident response policies are found, which could impact transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small sports club but could be improved to meet higher standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR requirements.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lørenskog-Rælingen Kappsvømmingsklubb

Description:

En svømmeklubb som fremmer idrettsglede der alle kan utvikle egne evner og ambisjoner. Klubben utvikler utøvere fra grunnleggende ferdigheter i vann til mestring på internasjonalt nivå.

Key Services:
Svømmekurs for barn og voksneSvømming - medlemskap og partierVannpolo aktiviteter og medlemskapArrangering av stevner og konkurranser
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle reCAPTCHAFacebook SDKNivo SliderCustom JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook SDK
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-structured local sports club site with clear navigation and relevant content.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the lrk.no security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete lrk.no security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_custspf.one.com include:_spf.uniweb.no ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

27/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:193.107.30.186
Name Servers:
ns01.no.brand.one.comDNS only
ns02.no.brand.one.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx2.mailpod1-osl1.g1i.uniweb.no
10: mx3.mailpod1-osl1.g1i.uniweb.no
10: mx1.mailpod1-osl1.g1i.uniweb.no
SOA:Serial: 2026071302, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled(Algorithm: 8)

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_custspf.one.com include:_spf.uniweb.no ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

How does lrk.no compare?

lrk.no scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and custom JavaScript, integrated with Google Fonts and Facebook SDK. It employs Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on forms. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization, especially for mobile devices where viewport is fixed at 1024 width. SEO basics are covered with meta tags and structured navigation, but no advanced SEO or accessibility features are evident. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small organization but could benefit from modernization and enhanced responsiveness.
Professional Report

Download the lrk.no report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Want OffSeq to fix this?

Book a 30-minute remediation call

Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.

OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services

Scan your own website

Liked the lrk.no report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about lrk.no

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website