Skip to main content

Security report for lrf.se

Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund (LRF) · Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund (LRF) is Sweden's leading organization representing agriculture, forestry, and rural businesses. The website serves as a comprehensive platform for members and stakeholders, offering information on membership benefits, advocacy, news, events, and regional activities. The organization positions itself as a key player in promoting sustainability, innovation, and strong green industries in Sweden. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Umbraco CMS, Alpine.js, and integrates Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, use of reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. Overall, the site reflects a mature, trustworthy organization with good digital maturity and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lrf.se

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LRF holds a dominant market position as the largest Swedish organization for agriculture and forestry sectors, focusing on membership services, advocacy, and rural business development. Their business model revolves around member engagement, providing discounts, expert support, and political influence. The website content and structure indicate a well-established entity targeting Swedish farmers, foresters, and rural entrepreneurs. The organization leverages partnerships with service providers like CookieTractor and cloud hosting on Azure. Growth indicators include active news updates, events, and regional presence. The absence of direct contact emails on the homepage suggests controlled communication channels, likely to manage member interactions effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and modern security headers implied. Use of Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam and abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user choice, aligning with GDPR requirements. Monitoring tools like New Relic are integrated for performance and error tracking. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Recommendations include publishing security policies and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide direct contact information for security incidents, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance Content Security Policy headers and other security headers to further harden the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund (LRF)
Description
LRF är Sveriges ledande organisation för lantbruk, skogsbruk och landsbygdsföretagande. De driver hållbarhet, innovation och starka gröna näringar.
Key services
Member benefits and discounts, Advocacy and political influence, Information and expert support, Events and activities, Regional representation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, New Relic monitoring, CookieTractor consent management, Umbraco Forms, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Platforms
Umbraco CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
CookieTractor
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. Professional design and clear navigation structure.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via contact page.
  6. WHOIS lookup failed due to querying subdomain instead of root domain.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Umbraco CMS platform with Alpine.js for frontend interactivity. It uses Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and monitoring, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting is inferred to be on Microsoft Azure based on cookies and headers. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and accessibility considerations. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and performance monitoring indicates a mature technical infrastructure. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and to document security practices publicly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lrf.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lrf.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.