Skip to main content

Security report for lps.coop

Legacoop Produzione e Servizi · Other · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Legacoop Produzione e Servizi is an Italian cooperative association representing worker cooperatives across multiple sectors including construction, logistics, manufacturing, and services. Founded in 2022, it serves as an important national body promoting cooperative values and supporting its members through representation, sector-specific initiatives, and participation in European projects. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with active social media engagement and structured content aimed at cooperative stakeholders. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with a modern tech stack including popular plugins for SEO, sliders, and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO practices and structured data implementation. Analytics are handled via Matomo and WP Statistics, indicating moderate user tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some security plugins in use, but there are areas for improvement such as enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing formal security and privacy policies. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the WHOIS data is consistent with the business identity, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is a credible and professional platform for the cooperative association, but it would benefit from enhanced security policies, privacy documentation, and incident response information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lps.coop

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Legacoop Produzione e Servizi occupies a significant position in the Italian cooperative sector, focusing on worker cooperatives in diverse industries. Its business model centers on advocacy, representation, and support services rather than direct commercial activities. Revenue likely derives from membership fees and project participation. The association maintains a broad partnership ecosystem with multiple cooperative organizations and industry bodies, enhancing its influence and reach. The website content and linked partners reflect a mature cooperative network with strategic European ties. Growth indicators include active news updates, events, and participation in European projects. The association targets cooperative members, policymakers, and industry stakeholders, positioning itself as a key player in Italy's social economy landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of content protection plugins. However, the absence of DNSSEC, limited security headers, and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The cookie consent mechanism complies with basic GDPR requirements, but the absence of a privacy policy reduces compliance confidence. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mediagroup98 Soc. Coop.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Legacoop Produzione e Servizi
Description
Promuoviamo e rappresentiamo le cooperative tra lavoratori e i valori del fare impresa cooperativa. Per noi la cooperazione è lavoro.
Key services
Representation of worker cooperatives, Sector-specific cooperative support, News and information dissemination, Event organization, European project participation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, MasterSlider, Yoast SEO, Easy Digital Downloads, LayerSlider, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Meta Slider and Carousel, AddToAny sharing, Passster content protection, WP Statistics, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (Passster content protector)
  • Cookie consent banner with consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professional and relevant to cooperative associations
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO plugins
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with a consent mechanism
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main pages
  6. Multiple social media channels linked and active
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency
  8. Security headers could be improved
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled
  10. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a robust set of plugins for SEO (Yoast), sliders (MasterSlider, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution), analytics (Matomo, WP Statistics), and content protection (Passster). The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. The presence of multiple slider plugins may introduce some technical overhead. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter Cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the domain registrar is Ascio Technologies, Inc. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lps.coop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lps.coop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.