The website www.lppapsihologi.lv is a WordPress-based informational blog focused on the psychology of gambling, addiction, and related mental health topics. It provides educational articles primarily in Latvian, targeting individuals interested in understanding gambling behavior and its biopsychosocial effects. The site uses the Kadence theme and common WordPress plugins but lacks advanced SEO and structured data implementations. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with HTTPS enabled and mobile responsiveness, but it lacks security headers and privacy compliance features such as cookie consent and privacy policies. No contact or business information is provided, which limits trust and credibility. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site serves as a niche educational resource but requires improvements in security, privacy, and business transparency to enhance trustworthiness and compliance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention lppapsihologi.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for lppapsihologi.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The site operates as a small-scale informational blog without clear commercial services or monetization visible. Its market position is niche, focusing on gambling psychology in the Latvian language. The business model appears to be content-driven, possibly for awareness or educational purposes. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or contact channels that indicate broader business operations. The lack of contact details and privacy policies suggests limited business maturity. Growth potential depends on content expansion and improved compliance. No related or partner domains were identified.
Security posture
The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended best practices. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and privacy compliance measures.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
Publish contact information and a security policy to increase business transparency and trust.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security readiness.
Improve SEO and accessibility by adding structured data, Open Graph tags, and accessibility features.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Website focused on psychology of gambling, addiction, mental health impacts, decision making in gambling, and biopsychosocial effects of pathological gambling.
Key services
Educational articles on gambling psychology and addiction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Kadence Theme, WordPress Popular Posts Plugin, Contextual Related Posts Plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is a WordPress blog focused on gambling psychology in Latvian language.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found.
No security policy or incident response information published.
HTTPS is enabled; no visible security headers detected.
No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress plugins.
Content is mature-themed due to gambling focus but no explicit adult content.
Website uses Kadence theme and popular WordPress plugins.
Navigation menu is empty; limited site structure visible.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and several plugins such as WordPress Popular Posts and Contextual Related Posts. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses modern CSS variables for styling. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles but no advanced features. Hosting provider and WHOIS details are not available due to query limits, limiting infrastructure insights. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small WordPress blog but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO/security features.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with lppapsihologi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lppapsihologi.lv.