Skip to main content

Security report for lpkomiteja.lv

Latvijas Paralimpiskā komiteja · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Paralimpiskā komiteja is the official national Paralympic committee representing athletes with disabilities in Latvia. The organization focuses on promoting Paralympic sports, supporting athletes, organizing events, and disseminating relevant information to the Latvian Paralympic community and the general public. The website serves as a central hub for news, event calendars, galleries, and organizational resources, targeting athletes, sports federations, sponsors, and supporters within Latvia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome. SEO is enhanced by the Yoast SEO plugin, and the site includes structured data for improved search engine understanding. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Analytics are implemented via WP Statistics with a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML source. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website's professional presentation, official social media presence, and partner sponsorships suggest legitimacy. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges were found, allowing full content access. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid digital presence for a non-profit sports organization with good content quality and technical implementation. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with cookie consent and a privacy policy page. The risk level is low, but recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lpkomiteja.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Latvijas Paralimpiskā komiteja holds a key position as the national Paralympic committee in Latvia, serving a niche but important market segment focused on disability sports. Its business model is non-profit, relying on sponsorships, partnerships, and government or organizational support. The presence of multiple well-known sponsors and partners such as Bite, Toyota, and airBaltic indicates a strong partnership ecosystem. The organization targets athletes with disabilities, sports federations, and the Latvian public interested in Paralympic sports. The website supports growth by providing event information, news updates, and resources, which helps maintain engagement and visibility. The lack of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication approach, possibly centralized through other channels. Overall, the organization appears stable with a focused mission and a solid digital footprint.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection indicates room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The use of WordPress and multiple plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate plugin-related vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced security headers, published policies, and a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Paralimpiskā komiteja
Description
Latvijas Paralimpiskās komitejas oficiāla mājas lapa
Key services
Promotion of Paralympic sports, Organization of sports events and championships, Support for athletes with disabilities, Information dissemination about Paralympic activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap 4.3.1, FontAwesome 4.7.0, Yoast SEO plugin, WordPress 6.6.1, Fancybox 3.1.28, Isotope 4.2.0
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local Paralympic community
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented inline
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. Presence of multiple sponsors and partners indicates trust
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and FontAwesome for icons. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, with structured data implemented in JSON-LD format to improve search engine indexing. The site loads multiple CSS and JS libraries from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate, with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources detected. Mobile optimization is good, supported by Bootstrap's responsive grid system. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA labels and semantic HTML, but could be improved. The site uses WP Statistics for analytics, employing JavaScript beacons and cookies with a 30-day retention period. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a small to medium-sized non-profit organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lpkomiteja.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lpkomiteja.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.