Skip to main content

Security report for loydaasianajaja.fi

Suomen Asianajajat – Finlands Advokater – Finnish Bar Association · Government · Finland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suomen Asianajajat is a Finnish Bar Association responsible for regulating and supervising lawyers in Finland. The website provides a comprehensive lawyer search service, legal advice information, and resources for both private individuals and corporate clients. It holds a strong market position as a key governmental and professional organization in the Finnish legal sector, offering services such as professional oversight, training, and member support. The site targets Finnish residents and legal professionals, with multilingual support for Swedish and English. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO and hosted on LiteSpeed servers with DNS managed by Datacenter.fi and Azure Web Apps. Despite good content quality and SEO optimization, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS, which is a critical security shortfall. Security headers are minimal, and email security mechanisms like DMARC and DNSSEC are missing. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy and cookie policy present, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism is detected. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loydaasianajaja.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a governmental and professional entity with a service-oriented business model focused on legal professionals and clients seeking legal assistance. Its revenue streams likely include membership fees, training services, and possibly public funding. The website ecosystem includes partner domains for lawyer search, supervisory authority, and client service portals, indicating a collaborative network. The site’s multilingual approach and comprehensive content suggest a mature digital presence aimed at broad accessibility. The absence of terms of service and limited incident response information indicates areas for governance improvement. The organization maintains active social media channels, enhancing outreach and engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. The presence of HSTS header is positive but insufficient without HTTPS. Missing DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records further weaken email and DNS security. No advanced security policies or incident response contacts are published, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. The site uses modern technologies but does not leverage their security features fully. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and email security configurations is critical to reduce risk and comply with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement full HSTS policy with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Configure DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records properly to secure email delivery and prevent spoofing.
  5. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to protect DNS integrity and certificate issuance.
  6. Add a visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  7. Publish terms of service and incident response policies including security contact information.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  9. Improve performance monitoring and optimization to enhance user experience.
  10. Maintain consistent branding and trust signals across all digital channels.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Suomen Asianajajat – Finlands Advokater – Finnish Bar Association
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Yoast SEO plugin version 25.3, using jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome for icons. It is hosted on LiteSpeed server with DNS managed by Datacenter.fi and uses Azure Web Apps as indicated by TXT records. The site has good SEO metadata, structured data in JSON-LD format describing the organization and webpage, and supports multiple languages (Finnish, Swedish, English). Performance metrics are missing, but the lack of load time data suggests potential for optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, indicating good compliance. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is non-existent or invalid, with no TLS protocols enabled, which is a critical technical risk. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking but lacks a cookie consent banner. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loydaasianajaja.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loydaasianajaja.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.