Skip to main content

Security report for low.gallery

LOW Gallery · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LOW Gallery is a Riga-based independent art platform that connects artists and audiences primarily within the Baltic region and internationally. The platform organizes and curates exhibitions, projects, talks, and cultural happenings, positioning itself as a niche regional art hub. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting artists and cultural communities. Founded in 2018, the platform maintains a small business size with a focused cultural mission. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern themes and plugins such as Bricks Theme and Rank Math SEO. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and hosting services, employs lazy loading for images, and integrates structured data for SEO enhancement. The site performs well with good mobile optimization and fast loading times, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, it lacks several important security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR compliance indicators. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent, which could be a risk factor. Overall, LOW Gallery presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with moderate security posture and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching low.gallery

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LOW Gallery operates in the cultural and arts sector, focusing on the Baltic region with international outreach. Its business model centers on curating and hosting art exhibitions and projects, engaging artists and audiences through events and talks. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its regional specialization and curated cultural content. Revenue streams likely include event sponsorships, commissions, and partnerships with cultural institutions. The target customer segments include artists, art enthusiasts, and cultural organizations. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and international collaborations. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes curators and cultural houses. Operationally, the platform maintains a small, focused team with a digital presence optimized for engagement and visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections active. However, the absence of DNSSEC and key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates gaps in defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies and incident response mechanisms are missing, which could expose the organization to compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. The minimal user tracking and limited analytics reduce privacy risks but also limit insights into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small cultural platform but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LOW Gallery
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LOW Gallery
Description
An independent art platform connecting artists and audiences with the Baltic region and beyond through events, talks, exhibitions and happenings.
Key services
Art exhibitions, Art projects, Events and talks, Cultural happenings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Cloudflare, Automatic CSS, Bricks Theme, Perfmatters Lazy Load, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional art platform focused on Baltic region and international artists.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage; contact form available on contact page.
  4. Good use of structured data for SEO and rich snippets.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Website uses modern WordPress theme and plugins with lazy loading for performance.
  8. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  9. Minimal user tracking limited to Cloudflare Insights.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Bricks theme and several performance optimization plugins such as Perfmatters for lazy loading. SEO is enhanced via the Rank Math plugin with structured data implemented in JSON-LD format. Hosting and DNS are managed through Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile responsiveness, with a clean and professional design. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No major technical debt or legacy technology was detected. The use of modern CSS and JavaScript frameworks supports a smooth user experience. However, security-related technical configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers are missing, representing technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with low.gallery. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review low.gallery.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.