Skip to main content

Security report for loupe.link

.LOUPE · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website loupe.link represents .LOUPE, a specialized provider of compliance management solutions focusing on whistleblowing, anti-corruption, integrity management, risk assessments, and corporate sustainability due diligence. The company targets businesses requiring turnkey compliance solutions, positioning itself as a niche player with ISO 27001 certification enhancing its credibility. The website is built on modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with integrated analytics and cookie consent mechanisms reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies, though some areas like explicit Terms of Service and vulnerability disclosure policies are missing. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loupe.link

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention loupe.link, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for loupe.link right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the compliance and risk management sector, offering SaaS solutions tailored to corporate integrity and regulatory requirements. Its market positioning is focused on compliance professionals and organizations needing to meet legal directives such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The company leverages partnerships with data reporting and analytics providers, and its marketing strategy includes targeted tracking and retargeting via Google and LeadFeeder. The absence of direct contact details on the main page suggests a focus on qualified leads through forms or partner channels. The business model is subscription-based software delivery with a strong emphasis on data protection and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent with opt-in/out options, and implementation of key security headers. The presence of ISO 27001 certification indicates adherence to recognized information security management standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is robust but could be enhanced by transparency and formalized incident handling processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear Terms of Service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Provide visible and verified contact information for customer support and security inquiries to facilitate communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
.LOUPE
Description
Whistleblowing, anti-corruption, integrity management, risk assessments and fulfillment of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive with .LOUPE – focused on business integrity.
Key services
Whistleblowing, Anti-corruption, Integrity management, Risk assessments, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive fulfillment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Video.js, Google Tag Manager, LeadFeeder, Matomo Analytics, DataReporter cookie consent
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-out and opt-in options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, LeadFeeder, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
LeadFeeder, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  3. No explicit Terms of Service page found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. ISO 27001 certification indicated, enhancing trust.
  7. Privacy policy is detailed and GDPR compliant.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. Website content is professional and business-focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Nuxt.js and Vue.js, enabling server-side rendering and good SEO performance. It integrates Video.js for media content and uses Google Tag Manager alongside Matomo and LeadFeeder for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses a cookie consent solution from DataReporter. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, though no specific hosting provider information was identified. The site uses standard security headers and HTTPS, reflecting good technical hygiene. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize security disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loupe.link. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loupe.link.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.