Skip to main content

Security report for louadvokatfirma.dk

LOU Advokatfirma · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LOU Advokatfirma is a Danish fullservice law firm with offices in multiple cities including København, Aarhus, Randers, Viborg, and Hobro. The firm offers a broad range of legal specialties aimed at providing comprehensive advisory services to both business clients and private individuals. The website reflects a professional presence with consistent branding and a focus on regional market coverage. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO practices and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The use of Google Tag Manager and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing approach. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and employs consent management but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are recommended for enhanced protection and transparency. Overall, the site is well-structured and trustworthy, though it would benefit from publishing privacy and terms of service documents and providing direct contact information for improved user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 6 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching louadvokatfirma.dk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LOU Advokatfirma positions itself as a regional leader in legal services across several Danish cities, targeting both corporate and private clients. Its business model is based on fullservice legal advisory, leveraging multiple specialties to serve diverse client needs. The firm maintains an active presence on social media platforms such as Facebook and LinkedIn, supporting its marketing and client engagement efforts. The website's integration of advanced cookie consent and analytics tools suggests a focus on data-driven marketing and compliance with European privacy regulations. The absence of explicit contact details and legal policy pages may limit client trust and regulatory compliance, representing areas for strategic improvement. No suspicious or unrelated domains were found linked, indicating a focused and legitimate digital footprint.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and the implementation of Cookiebot for managing user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. Google Consent Mode is also configured to restrict ad and analytics storage until consent is given, enhancing privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Add a security policy page and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are in use and maintain up-to-date software versions.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LOU Advokatfirma
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LOU Advokatfirma
Description
LOU er et fullservice advokatfirma og har mange specialer. Derved sikrer vi den bedst rådgivning af både erhvervsvirksomheder og private kunder.
Key services
legal advisory, fullservice law specialties
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.2.2, Yoast SEO plugin v20.8, jQuery, Cookiebot CMP, Google Tag Manager, NicePress Cycle slider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Google Consent Mode implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional law firm site with multi-city presence in Denmark.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with standard SEO and cookie consent tools.
  3. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed HTML snippet.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and consent management but lacks explicit security headers and incident response info.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.2.2, utilizing the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It employs jQuery and a custom slider plugin for interactive content. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tag management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and webpage. Performance appears moderate with standard WordPress assets and external scripts. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with louadvokatfirma.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review louadvokatfirma.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.