Skip to main content

Security report for lomec.cz

Farnost Lomec · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Farnost Lomec operates a pilgrimage site known as Poutní místo LOMEC, providing spiritual services, accommodation, and community events primarily for seekers and visitors interested in religious and cultural experiences. The website reflects a small-scale, community-focused non-profit organization with a clear target audience and consistent branding. Technically, the site uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries, with integration of Google Analytics and social media SDKs for engagement and tracking. The site is accessible and mobile-optimized, though some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit privacy or security policies are published. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lomec.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a local pilgrimage and community center in the Czech Republic, offering accommodation, spiritual services, and event hosting. Its business model is non-profit and community-oriented, relying on visitor engagement and donations. The website's social media integration and event calendar indicate active community involvement. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information online suggests a small organizational size. The site does not appear to engage in commercial sales or e-commerce. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth indicators include active social media channels and event promotion. Strategic observations include the need for improved digital trust signals and clearer compliance documentation to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS likely enabled but lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. The cookie consent mechanism is well implemented, offering granular user control and compliance with GDPR principles, though no explicit privacy policy page was found. No forms collecting personal data were detected, reducing immediate data protection risks. The absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits the site's readiness for vulnerability reporting and incident management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including official emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Farnost Lomec
Description
Poutní místo LOMEC is a pilgrimage site offering spiritual services, accommodation, events, and community activities primarily targeting seekers and visitors interested in religious and cultural experiences.
Key services
Pilgrimage site activities, Accommodation at Poutní dům, Event hosting and calendar, Spiritual services and church activities, Cafe services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Swiper, Cubeportfolio, Magnific Popup, Leaflet, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer.
  6. Social media presence is strong and consistent with brand.
  7. Technical stack uses common modern libraries and frameworks.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. No forms with data collection fields detected in provided HTML.
  10. Content is focused on religious pilgrimage and community services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and several UI libraries such as Swiper and Cubeportfolio for interactive elements. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site includes social media SDKs for Facebook and YouTube, enhancing user engagement. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic keywords and description meta tags. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lomec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lomec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.