Skip to main content

Security report for logtail.com

Better Stack, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Better Stack, Inc. operates a mature and reputable SaaS platform focused on observability, log management, and incident response. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including log aggregation, uptime monitoring, incident management, and AI-driven incident silencing, targeting engineering teams and enterprises. Their market position is strengthened by cost-effective solutions leveraging advanced technologies like Clickhouse and OpenTelemetry. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity with modern frameworks such as Vue.js and Ruby on Rails, supported by extensive analytics and marketing integrations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, CSRF protection, and error monitoring via Sentry, though some improvements in privacy compliance and vulnerability disclosure are recommended. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and consistency of the business, supporting a high trust level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logtail.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention logtail.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for logtail.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Better Stack is positioned as a competitive player in the technology sector, focusing on scalable and reliable observability solutions. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS, serving a global audience of developers and enterprises. The company benefits from a strong ecosystem of related domains and services, including uptime monitoring and telemetry. Their customer base includes notable companies, enhancing their credibility. The platform's integration capabilities and cost optimization strategies provide competitive advantages. Growth potential is supported by a clear focus on developer experience and enterprise needs. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive marketing approach further solidify their market presence.

Security posture

The website and platform exhibit a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and CSRF tokens in forms. The presence of Sentry for error monitoring indicates proactive incident detection. However, the absence of a published security.txt file and explicit incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. Compliance with SOC 2 and GDPR is indicated, but cookie consent mechanisms are not clearly implemented, which may pose privacy compliance risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner to enhance privacy compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish explicit incident response contact details to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Better Stack, Inc.
Description
Better Stack provides an AI-native platform for on-call and incident response with monitoring, status pages, tracing, infrastructure monitoring, and log management.
Key services
Log management, Incident management, Uptime monitoring, Status pages, Tracing, Infrastructure monitoring, AI incident silencing, Dashboards
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Pinia, Stimulus, Turbo Rails, Clickhouse, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter UWT, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Plausible Analytics, Sentry
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails
Platforms
Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN), Better Stack own hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Use of nonce in CSP

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Plausible Analytics, PostHog, Bing UET, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter UWT
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter UWT, Bing UET, Plausible Analytics, PostHog
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, PostHog
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear navigation and rich content.
  3. Strong use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  4. Good security practices observed, including HTTPS and CSRF protection.
  5. Comprehensive business information and contact details provided.
  6. Use of multiple advertising and tracking services with moderate privacy compliance.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Vue.js, Pinia, Stimulus, and Ruby on Rails, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The platform leverages Clickhouse for high-performance log querying, supporting up to 1 billion log lines per second. Analytics and marketing tools are extensively integrated, enabling detailed user behavior tracking and targeted advertising. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with comprehensive meta tags and SEO practices. Technical risks are minimal, though ongoing maintenance of third-party dependencies and privacy compliance should be prioritized.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logtail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logtail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.