Skip to main content

Security report for logosystems.co.uk

LogoSystems · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LogoSystems is a UK-based specialist IT support provider focusing on Apple Mac business support, offering subscription-based services, repairs, upgrades, and cloud solutions. Their staff are Apple Certified Macintosh Technicians, positioning them as a trusted expert in the Apple Mac IT support niche. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Elementor and Gravity Forms, featuring clear navigation and relevant content tailored to business customers using Apple devices. The technical infrastructure includes modern SEO and analytics tools, with HTTPS enabled and CAPTCHA protection on forms, indicating a good security posture. However, the absence of a visible cookie consent mechanism and published security or incident response policies suggests areas for compliance improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to an invalid query format, but the domain appears legitimate based on website content and trust signals. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business presence with moderate technical maturity and a good security baseline, suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logosystems.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LogoSystems operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting businesses that use Apple Mac and iOS devices in the UK. Their business model combines monthly subscription IT support with one-off repair and upgrade services, providing predictable budgeting for clients. The company leverages certifications and customer reviews to build trust and differentiate itself in a competitive market. Their partnership ecosystem includes reselling Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Dropbox Business. The website's content and structure indicate a small-sized company with a focused market niche. Growth potential exists through expanding managed services and device management projects. The company maintains active social media profiles to engage customers and enhance brand visibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA on forms to mitigate automated abuse, reflecting good security practices. No explicit security headers were confirmed from the data, suggesting an opportunity to enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial due to the lack of a cookie consent banner, which is important under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small IT service provider but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Correct WHOIS query method to obtain domain registration details for full legitimacy verification.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security documentation to maintain compliance and customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LogoSystems
Description
LogoSystems provides specialist IT support services and cloud-based solutions specifically for Apple Mac devices and associated hardware. They are resellers for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Dropbox Business. Their staff are Apple Certified Macintosh Technicians. They offer monthly support subscriptions, repairs, upgrades, and managed cloud services for Apple Mac computers and iOS devices.
Key services
Mac support subscriptions, Mac repairs, Mac upgrades, Managed cloud services, Mobile device management (MDM), Device buyback (Sell Us Your Mac)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Trustpilot widget, jQuery
Frameworks
Bridge WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CAPTCHA on contact forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
Trustpilot Reviews
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional IT support service provider focused on Apple Mac business support in the UK.
  2. Content is well structured with clear service offerings and contact mechanisms.
  3. Use of modern WordPress technologies and SEO plugins.
  4. Trust indicators include Apple certifications and Trustpilot reviews.
  5. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, which is a GDPR compliance gap.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to incorrect query format; domain appears legitimate but cannot be fully verified.
  7. No security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Contact form collects detailed device and personal information with CAPTCHA protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Bridge theme and Elementor page builder, with Gravity Forms for data collection. It integrates Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google Analytics and Ahrefs for traffic and SEO analysis. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains such as Google and Trustpilot, indicating use of third-party services for analytics and reputation management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small business website, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logosystems.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logosystems.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.