Skip to main content

Security report for logojoy.com

Looka Inc. · Technology · Canada

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Looka Inc. operates a leading AI-powered logo maker platform trusted by over 20 million businesses worldwide. The company provides an easy-to-use online service that enables small businesses and entrepreneurs to create professional logos and comprehensive brand kits without needing design expertise. Their market position is strong, supported by high customer satisfaction and extensive media coverage. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, hosted behind Cloudflare for performance and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, anti-clickjacking measures, and cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security headers could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, fast, and user-friendly, with clear business credibility and compliance with privacy regulations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a dedicated security policy, and improving incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logojoy.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Looka's business model centers on SaaS delivery of AI-driven logo design and branding tools, monetized through premium logo packages and brand kit subscriptions. Their competitive advantage lies in AI customization, comprehensive asset delivery, and strong customer support. The target market includes small businesses and non-designers seeking affordable branding solutions. Partnerships with Stripe for payments and integration with major ad and analytics platforms support their ecosystem. Growth indicators include a mature domain, extensive user base, and active social media presence. The company maintains a vulnerability disclosure program, reflecting a proactive security stance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and anti-clickjacking scripts. Use of reputable third-party services like Stripe and Intercom adds to security reliability. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly declared, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Incident response contact information is not publicly detailed, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly declare comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention and privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Looka Inc.
Description
Looka is a free logo maker and logo generator trusted by over 20 million businesses. It uses AI to create custom logos and brand kits including multiple logo files, business cards, email signatures, and branded assets.
Key services
AI-powered logo maker, Brand kit with logo files and branded assets, Business card and social media templates, Customer support via chat and email
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Cloudflare DNS, Stripe (payment processing), Intercom (customer chat), CookieYes (cookie consent management)
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti clickjacking script implemented
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party services for analytics and payments

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Bing UET, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  3. Comprehensive FAQ and customer support options available.
  4. Use of multiple reputable third-party services for analytics, payments, and customer engagement.
  5. Good security posture with HTTPS and anti-clickjacking measures.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  7. Clear business identity and branding consistency.
  8. Active social media presence with multiple verified accounts linked.
  9. Domain registration and WHOIS data support legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for optimization and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is fast with mobile optimization and accessibility features implemented. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and fonts, improving load times. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security header declarations and incident response transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust, scalable, and user-friendly platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logojoy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logojoy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.