Skip to main content

Security report for logitechg.com

Logitech G · Technology · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logitech G is a prominent brand specializing in advanced gaming peripherals including mice, keyboards, headsets, and racing simulation equipment. The website reflects a mature e-commerce platform with a global reach, targeting serious gamers and enthusiasts. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Overall, the site demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness consistent with a large technology company.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of logitechg.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logitechg.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logitech G operates under the umbrella of Logitech International S.A., a large multinational technology company. The brand focuses on gaming hardware and software, serving a global market with a broad product portfolio. The website highlights partnerships and subsidiaries such as Streamlabs and Ultimate Ears, enhancing its ecosystem. The business model is primarily direct-to-consumer e-commerce supported by comprehensive product information and customer support. The presence of exclusive offers and refurbished products indicates a strategy to capture diverse customer segments and maximize revenue streams.

Security posture

The website employs standard security best practices including HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. However, there is no visible dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure program, which could be improved to enhance transparency and incident readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Incident response contact information is not publicly disclosed, which is a gap in security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reporting.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance data retention and privacy policy details to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logitech G
Description
Logitech G tarjoaa pelihiiret, pelinäppäimistöt, pelikuulokemikrofonit, kilpaohjauspyörät ja ohjaimet, jotka on suunniteltu parantamaan pelaamiskokemusta.
Key services
Pelivarusteiden myynti, Ohjelmistot pelilaitteille, Asiakastuki
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, YouTube iframe API, Yottaa CDN, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Tealium (utag.js), Evergage
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Quantum Metric, Evergage
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tealium, Evergage, Quantum Metric, Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
Tealium, Evergage
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No signs of phishing or malware
  3. Strong branding and consistent user experience
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  7. No explicit security or incident response pages found
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or query restrictions
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and YouTube iframe API. It uses Yottaa CDN for performance optimization and integrates OneTrust for cookie consent management. Marketing and analytics tools include Tealium, Evergage, Adobe Analytics, and Quantum Metric, indicating a sophisticated data-driven approach. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for further optimization. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logitechg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logitechg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.