Skip to main content

Security report for loginet.hu

LogiNet · Technology · Hungary

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LogiNet is a Hungarian technology company specializing in e-commerce systems, webshop development, mobile application creation, and custom software development. Positioned as a professional service provider, LogiNet targets businesses requiring tailored e-commerce and digital solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with good SEO practices, mobile optimization, and integration of modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic, though explicit security headers and policies are not prominently published. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid technical and business foundation with room for enhanced security transparency and contact information clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loginet.hu

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LogiNet operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, offering specialized development services including webshop and mobile app creation. Their business model is service-oriented, catering primarily to e-commerce businesses in Hungary. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Google and Meta for marketing and analytics, indicating a strategic approach to customer acquisition and engagement. While the website lacks explicit terms of service and detailed contact information, the presence of GDPR-compliant cookie management and privacy policy references suggests regulatory awareness. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with consistent branding and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing transparency and compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for comprehensive security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Enhancing security headers and publishing a security policy would strengthen the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Create and make accessible a dedicated security policy and incident response contact page.
  3. Add clear and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Publish terms of service to clarify user and client obligations and rights.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LogiNet
Description
Professzionális megoldások minden e-kereskedelmi igényre: webshop fejlesztés, mobil applikáció készítés, egyedi webfejlesztés, e-commerce tanácsadás
Key services
webshop fejlesztés, mobil applikáció készítés, egyedi webfejlesztés, e-commerce tanácsadás
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Linkedin
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie declarations
  3. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing integrations present
  4. No explicit contact information found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. No visible terms of service or explicit security policy pages
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  7. Content is professional and business-focused
  8. Good SEO and metadata usage including Open Graph tags
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Hotjar for user behavior analytics. The site is mobile optimized and uses good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. No CMS or hosting provider was explicitly detected from the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for further modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loginet.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loginet.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.