Skip to main content

Security report for logikfabriken.se

Logikfabriken AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logikfabriken AB is a Swedish consulting company focused on providing a flexible and employee-centric work environment where consultants choose their assignments and set their own salaries. The company positions itself as innovative and knowledge-driven, targeting professionals seeking autonomy and development opportunities within the consulting sector. The website reflects this business model with clear messaging and a modern design. Technically, the website is built using React and Material-UI, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good user experience and navigation clarity. However, there is no evidence of advanced SEO or accessibility features beyond basic implementation. From a security perspective, the website lacks critical elements such as privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information. No HTTPS status was explicitly detected in the provided data, but no blocking or WAF mechanisms were found. The absence of these security and privacy features lowers the overall security posture and compliance level. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logikfabriken.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logikfabriken operates in the technology consulting sector in Sweden, emphasizing a unique employee-driven business model that differentiates it from traditional consulting firms. Its market positioning leverages flexibility and transparency, appealing to consultants who value autonomy. The company maintains a small size with at least one subsidiary in Linköping. The business model likely generates revenue through consulting fees with a focus on sustainable employee satisfaction and retention. The company has an active social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn, supporting brand awareness and recruitment efforts. No direct partnerships or certifications were identified, suggesting a focus on organic growth and internal capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several important elements. There are no visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of HTTPS confirmation in the data is a concern, though no explicit indication of HTTP-only was found. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics scripts, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Ensure the website is fully served over HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and visible HTTPS indicators.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements and SEO enhancements to increase reach and usability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Logikfabriken AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logikfabriken AB
Description
Nytänkande, roligt och kunskapsdrivet konsultbolag med medarbetaren i fokus. Hos Logikfabriken väljer man själv sitt uppdrag, sätter sin egen lön, styr över sin egen utveckling och får vara med att utveckla världens bästa företag.
Key services
Consulting services, Flexible assignment selection, Employee-driven salary and development model
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Material-UI, JavaScript
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policies found on the website
  2. No visible contact phone numbers, only email and physical addresses
  3. No forms detected for contact or data collection
  4. Website uses modern React framework with Material-UI styling
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  6. Social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn
  7. No security headers or explicit security policies found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with Material-UI components, indicating a modern front-end framework and styling approach. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunk files, suggesting code splitting for performance optimization. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and description, but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced SEO. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal external data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from SEO and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logikfabriken.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logikfabriken.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.