Skip to main content

Security report for lockheedmartin.com

Lockheed Martin Corporation · Government · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lockheed Martin Corporation is a leading global aerospace, defense, and security company with a strong market position serving government and commercial clients worldwide. The company offers a broad portfolio of products and services including aircraft, missile defense, cyber solutions, space systems, and advanced research and development. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, multi-regional support, and clear corporate governance and ethics information. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Algolia search, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and tracking tools, hosted likely on a robust CMS platform (Adobe Experience Manager). Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lockheedmartin.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lockheedmartin.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13,803
Employees
1
Customers
33
Third parties
13,769
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-08-31 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lockheedmartin.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –lockheedmartin.com2025-08-31

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lockheed Martin operates primarily in the government sector as a defense contractor with a global footprint. Its business model focuses on B2G and B2B engagements, supported by a large workforce and extensive supplier network. The company maintains a strong brand with consistent messaging and a focus on innovation and sustainability. The website supports recruitment, investor relations, and supplier engagement, indicating a mature ecosystem. Partnerships and related domains are well integrated, enhancing the corporate digital footprint. The company’s longevity and domain registration history reinforce its legitimacy and market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS and domain status protections. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure policy indicates proactive security management. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The site uses multiple tracking and analytics services, which are balanced by clear privacy and cookie policies. Incident response contact details are not publicly visible, which could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional hardening measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish detailed security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Description
Lockheed Martin is a leading global security, defense and aerospace contractor, ensuring those we serve always stay ahead of ready.
Key services
Aerospace products, Defense systems, Missile defense, Cybersecurity, Space systems, Training and sustainment, Research and development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Algolia Search, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bootstrap (implied by classes), YouTube iframe API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client and server transfer prohibitions on domain
  • Vulnerability disclosure policy published
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Dstillery
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Algolia Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to aerospace and defense sectors.
  3. Strong presence of corporate governance and ethics information.
  4. Multiple language and regional versions available.
  5. Extensive use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms.
  7. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  9. Social media and investor relations are actively maintained.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with extensive use of JavaScript libraries for search and analytics. The CMS appears to be Adobe Experience Manager, supporting a complex multi-regional site structure. Performance is moderate with video content and rich media, but mobile optimization and accessibility are excellent. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. The site integrates multiple external services for marketing and analytics, which should be monitored for performance and privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal but include potential complexity from numerous third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lockheedmartin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lockheedmartin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.